2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.12.113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface and Boney Landmarks for Sacral Neuromodulation: A Cadaveric Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If one relies on bony landmarks alone, lead placement could easily be at S2 or S4 in some of these patients. Similar observations have been made in relation to the distance from the midline to the foraminal edge . This individual variability illustrates the disadvantages of using “thumb rules” and highlights the need for proper measurement in each individual, which can only be done with x‐ray.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If one relies on bony landmarks alone, lead placement could easily be at S2 or S4 in some of these patients. Similar observations have been made in relation to the distance from the midline to the foraminal edge . This individual variability illustrates the disadvantages of using “thumb rules” and highlights the need for proper measurement in each individual, which can only be done with x‐ray.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Although these bony landmarks can usually be identified easily, the operator's experience is essential for correct positioning, as the orientation of the sacral bone and the amount of subcutaneous fatty tissue varies among individuals. Indeed, cadaver studies have shown large variability in size and distance of bony sacral landmarks: e.g., the distance from the upper part of the S3 foramen to the tip of the coccyx has a mean of 9.26 cm, but in only 18 cadavers the range was 3.4 cm . If one relies on bony landmarks alone, lead placement could easily be at S2 or S4 in some of these patients.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a study conducted by Deveneau et al [19], the mean height of the subjects was found to be 163.7 cm with a standard deviation of ±10.3 cm. In male cadavers, it was found to be 170.8 cm, with a standard deviation of ±5.2 cm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In the study conducted by Deveneau et al [19], a mean needle tip to a superior aspect of S3 was measured to be 1.2 ± 1.3 cm. In males, it was found to be 1.1 ± 1.1 cm, and in females, it was found to be 1.4 ± 1.5 cm, and the mean tip of the coccyx to the superior aspect of S3 was found to be 9.3 ± 0.9 cm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In the prone position, a needle harboring a single-electrode lead is advanced to correctly identify the S3 foramen. The S3 foramen can be identified fluoroscopically, or approximated anatomically as evident from cadaveric studies that showed the mean distance of the superior aspect of the S3 foramen is approximately cm from the coccyx, and laterally it is 2 cm from the middle of the sacral back region, while vertical interforamenal spaces are around 1.5 cm in length [59].…”
Section: Office-based Percutaneous Nerve Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%