2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.eti.2021.101868
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface active ionic liquid and Tween-80 blend as an effective dispersant for crude oil spill remediation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The SLNs were prepared using stearic acid as the physiological lipid that is widely available, is relatively cheap, and dissolves soluble flurbiprofen . Tween 80 was added as an emulsifier due to its HLB value, surface tension-reducing properties, stearic ability, nonionic nature, and improved permeation enhancement attribute . The particle size determined using photon correlation spectroscopy for the optimized SLN formulation (F5) was larger as compared to their SEM results (Table and Figure ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SLNs were prepared using stearic acid as the physiological lipid that is widely available, is relatively cheap, and dissolves soluble flurbiprofen . Tween 80 was added as an emulsifier due to its HLB value, surface tension-reducing properties, stearic ability, nonionic nature, and improved permeation enhancement attribute . The particle size determined using photon correlation spectroscopy for the optimized SLN formulation (F5) was larger as compared to their SEM results (Table and Figure ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This ratio was selected because it gave the highest effectiveness in our previous study. 14 The total surfactant mass fraction was 5%.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 60:40 (w/w) mixture of Tween-80 and [Bmim]­[Lausar] was prepared in water. This ratio was selected because it gave the highest effectiveness in our previous study . The total surfactant mass fraction was 5%.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations