Supraglottic Airway Devices in the Ambulatory Setting

Luba, Katarzyna; Cutter, Thomas W.

doi:10.1016/j.anclin.2010.02.004

Cited by 33 publications

(19 citation statements)

References 37 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…27) The usage of SGAs is limited to some patient populations and medical conditions such as decreased lung or chest compliance and increased airway resistance, glottic or subglottic airway obstruction, oropharyngeal anatomic abnormalities, or who are at high risk for aspiration and morbidly obese patients. 28) In present study mean BMI was 27.5 (19.86-43.44) kg m -2 and within 300 patients 83 patients have 30-35 kg m -2 , 6 patients have 35-40 kg m -2 , and 5 patients have >40 kg m -2 . Only 7 patients had a diagnosis of asthma but any adverse event and/or complication did not occur.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 46%

Endovenous Laser Ablation under General Anesthesia for Day Surgery: Feasibility and Outcomes of the 300 Patients

Arun

Öç

Duman

et al. 2014

ATCS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 46%

Endovenous Laser Ablation under General Anesthesia for Day Surgery: Feasibility and Outcomes of the 300 Patients

Arun

Öç

Duman

et al. 2014

ATCS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…[9] Airway morbidities occur less often with general anesthesia with a LMA, compared to endotracheal intubation. [9,11] Duration of hospitalization was investigated in a study which compared general anesthesia with a LMA and spinal anesthesia in patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair. In a study, the mean duration of hospitalization was 261.7 min (range 223 to 293 min) in the general anesthesia group vs 285.4 min (range 251 to 317 min) in the spinal anesthesia group.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Spinal anesthesia versus general anesthesia with a laryngeal mask airway in patients undergoing radiofrequency ablation for varicose veins

Lafçı¹

2017

Turk Gogus Kalp Dama

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ÖZAmaç: Bu çalışmada variköz ven nedeniyle radyofrekans ablasyon yapılan hastalarda spinal anestezi ve larengeal maske hava yolu ile genel anestezinin etkinliği karşılaştırıldı.Ça lış ma pla nı: Mayıs 2012-Aralık 2016 tarihleri arasında larengeal maske hava yolu ile genel anestezi veya spinal anestezi altında radyofrekans ablasyon, varislerin çıkarılması ve perforan ven bağlanması yapılan toplam 2999 hasta (1067 erkek, 1932 kadın; ort. yaş 43 yıl; dağılım 19-70 yıl) retrospektif olarak incelendi. Hastanede yatış süresi, ameliyat sonrası Görsel Analog Ölçeği (GAÖ) skorları, hasta memnuniyeti, bulantı, kusma, boğaz ağrısı, baş ağrısı, sırt ağrısı ve üriner retansiyon dahil olmak üzere tıbbi kayıtlar kullanılarak veriler kaydedildi. Bul gu lar:Hastaların 2512'sine larengeal maske hava yolu ile genel anestezi ve 487'sine spinal anestezi uygulandı. Ortalama hastanede yatış süresi genel anestezi grubunda 10.7 saat ve spinal anestezi grubunda 22.5 saat idi ve bu fark istatistiksel olarak anlamlı idi (p<0.001). Ameliyat sonrası birinci saatteki ağrı skorları spinal anestezi grubuna kıyasla genel anestezi grubunda daha yüksekti (0.1±0.1 cm'ye kıyasla 1.7±0.1 cm) (p<0.001). Hasta memnuniyeti genel anestezi grubunda, spinal anestezi grubuna kıyasla, daha yüksekti (%92'ye kıyasla %97) (p<0.001). Kusma insidansı genel anestezi grubunda yüksek iken, bulantı, baş ağrısı ve üriner retansiyon insidansı spinal anestezi grubunda daha yüksek idi (tümü için p<0.001).So nuç: Radyofrekans ablasyon sırasında larengeal maske hava yolu, spinal anesteziye kıyasla, hastaların erken taburcu olmasını sağlar ve hasta memnuniyetini artırır; ancak kusma ve boğaz ağrısı gibi yan etkiler görülebilir. Spinal anestezi ameliyat sonrası ağrının azalması ile larengeal maske hava yolu ile genel anesteziden daha ilişkili olmasına karşın, bulantı, baş ağrısı ve üriner retansiyona neden olabilir.Anah tarsöz cük ler: Larengeal maske hava yolu; radyofrekans ablasyon; spinal anestezi. ABSTRACTBackground: This study aims to compare the efficacy of spinal anesthesia and general anesthesia with a laryngeal mask airway in patients undergoing radiofrequency ablation for varicose veins.

show abstract

“…Why use an LMA over an ET? Supraglottic airway can be inserted without using neuromuscular blockade which is an advantage compared with tracheal intubation (96). In addition, non anaesthesiologists are typically more successful at placing LMAs compared with performing tracheal intubations (97).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The absence of neuromuscular blockade can allow spontaneous ventilation which is desirable, especially in an outpatient surgical setting for optimal drug titration and faster emergence (95). Patients receiving general anaesthesia in the outpatient setting for LMAs compared with ETs have been shown to have shorter PACU stays because the drug concentrations are more favourable with fewer side effects (96).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Regional anaesthesia with sedation protocol to safely debride sacral pressure ulcers

O'Neill¹,

Robins²,

Ayello³

et al. 2012

International Wound Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Supraglottic Airway Devices in the Ambulatory Setting

Cited by 33 publications

References 37 publications

Endovenous Laser Ablation under General Anesthesia for Day Surgery: Feasibility and Outcomes of the 300 Patients

Endovenous Laser Ablation under General Anesthesia for Day Surgery: Feasibility and Outcomes of the 300 Patients

Spinal anesthesia versus general anesthesia with a laryngeal mask airway in patients undergoing radiofrequency ablation for varicose veins

Regional anaesthesia with sedation protocol to safely debride sacral pressure ulcers

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About