2008
DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Suppression of Plant Resistance Gene-Based Immunity by a Fungal Effector

Abstract: The innate immune system of plants consists of two layers. The first layer, called basal resistance, governs recognition of conserved microbial molecules and fends off most attempted invasions. The second layer is based on Resistance (R) genes that mediate recognition of effectors, proteins secreted by pathogens to suppress or evade basal resistance. Here, we show that a plant-pathogenic fungus secretes an effector that can both trigger and suppress R gene-based immunity. This effector, Avr1, is secreted by th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
317
1
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 316 publications
(328 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(59 reference statements)
5
317
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The idea of plant symbionts as ''vaccines'' was first suggested long ago (Beauv- v www.esajournals.org erie 1901), and is now referred to as systemic acquired resistance (SAR) or induced systemic resistance (ISR; Van Wees et al 2008). This mechanism could also potentially work in the opposite direction: leaf endophytes could increase disease severity by suppressing plant genetic resistance (Houterman et al 2008). Similarly, systemic acquired susceptibility (SAS) to one pathogen can be caused by prior infection by another pathogen (Bonello et al 2008).…”
Section: Direct Versus Indirect Interaction Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The idea of plant symbionts as ''vaccines'' was first suggested long ago (Beauv- v www.esajournals.org erie 1901), and is now referred to as systemic acquired resistance (SAR) or induced systemic resistance (ISR; Van Wees et al 2008). This mechanism could also potentially work in the opposite direction: leaf endophytes could increase disease severity by suppressing plant genetic resistance (Houterman et al 2008). Similarly, systemic acquired susceptibility (SAS) to one pathogen can be caused by prior infection by another pathogen (Bonello et al 2008).…”
Section: Direct Versus Indirect Interaction Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further evidence for genetic interactions that go beyond the simple gene-for-gene model was found in the interaction of Fusarium oxysporum with the I resistance genes in tomato. The Avr1 effector induces resistance in the presence of the I-1 gene but suppresses the resistance function of the I-2 and I-3 resistance genes (Houterman et al, 2008). In the same pathosystem, two additional specific suppressors of I gene function were identified in the pathogen, indicating the requirement of two fungal genes for immunity conferred by one resistance gene (Gawehns et al, 2014;Ma et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has led to plants evolving disease resistance proteins able to detect perturbations to virulence targets that then activate a second line of defense described as effector-triggered immunity (ETI; Boller and He, 2009). This subsequent level of immunity can itself be suppressed through pathogen effector functions (Houterman et al, 2008), giving rise to the "zigzag" model for interactions of plant pathogens with the plant defense machinery (Jones and Dangl, 2006). ETI frequently conforms to a gene-for gene model (Flor, 1971) whereby single genes/loci in the pathogen interact with single dominant genes/loci in the plant, giving rise to immunity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%