Suppression of Pain by Sound

Gardner, Wallace J.; Licklider, J. C. R.; Weisz, A. Z.

doi:10.1126/science.132.3418.32

Cited by 130 publications

(42 citation statements)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Gardner, müzi in esas görevinin hastay rahatlatmak oldu unu belirtmektedir. Birçok hasta için a r y bast ran esas etken ses olmu tur (6).…”

Section: Odyoanaljez Ned R?unclassified

“…Toplam ses bas nc 116 desibel yükseklikte ve 0,0002 mikrober n üzerinde ayarlanabilir. 6 Beyaz ses'un uygulama dozu 5 dakikad r. Müsa-ade edilen total kümülatif uygulama dozu 1 saat için 10 dakika, 2 saat için 15 dakikad r. Her 1 dakikal k uygulama dozundan sonra yeni bir uygulama dozu için en az 2 dakikal k bir dinlenme periyodu olmal d r. Daha uzun veya daha k sa uygulama dozlar için ayarlamalar yap lmal d r (21).…”

Section: Tekn Kunclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

Diş Hekimliğinde odyoanaljezi

ASLANTÜRK¹

2014

Ankara Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Today, the pain in dental treatment is one of the sharpest pain sources which are known and described. According to the researchs it was established the pain of dental treatments causes psychological problems.The history of analgesia with music is as old as the history of medicine and the researchers began to develop teories about the neurological principals of the effects of music in the middle of the 20th century.Key Words: Audioanalgesia, Musical Therapy, Fair in Dentistry ÖZET Di hekimli inde a r bugün bilinen ve tan mlanan en iddetli a r kaynaklar ndan biridir. Ara t rmalara göre di tedavileri s ras nda duyulan a r lar n hastalarda psikolojik sorunlara yol açt görülmü tür.Müzikle analjezinin tarihi t p tarihi kadar eskiye dayanmakta olup 20. Yüzy l n ortalar nda ara t rmac lar müzi in etkilerinin nörolojik temelleri hakk nda teoriler geli tirmeye ba lam lard r.Anahtar Kelimeler: Odyoanaljezi, Müzikle Terapi, Di Hekimli inde Korku G R ster konservatif tedavi olsun ister cerrahi bir operasyon olsun, di tedavilerinden ço u hasta korkmakta ve çekinmektedir. Çal malarda gömülü di çekimlerinden hastalar n yakla k %50sinin korktu u rapor edilmi tir (1). Cerrahi ve di er dental giri imlerde aç a ç -kan bu korku hemodinamik de i iklikler oluturarak kardiyovasküler yan etkilere neden olmaktad r (2,3). lem s ras nda anksiyete ve korkuyu azaltmak için birtak m sedatif ilaçlar kullan lmaktad r ancak bu ilaçlar n fazla kullan lmas sonucu solunum depresyonu, hipotermi, hipotansiyon ve hatta bilinç kayb gibi yan etkiler görülebilmektedir. Hastalar n bu yan etkilere maruz kalmamalar için çe itli psikolojik müdahaleler üzerine çal lm t r (4). ODYOANALJEZ NED R?1959 y l nda ilk kez tan t ld ndan bu yana 'yüksek ses ile a r hissizli i sa layan odyoanaljezi tart ma konusu olmu tur (5). Gardner, müzi in esas görevinin hastay rahatlatmak oldu unu belirtmektedir. Birçok hasta için a r y bast ran esas etken ses olmu tur (6).Müzikle analjezinin esas , yüksek frekansl müzik kullan lmas yla baz bireylerde a r ya duyars zl n olu turulmas d r. Bir tür dikkat da tma yöntemidir (7).Ses ve müzi in t bbi de eri ile ilgili pek çok örnekler vard r. Özellikle 2 ana alanda yararlan l r. Psikiyatrik düzensizliklerin terapisinde ve anestezide yard mc olmaktad r. Marwick; lokal anestezi ile yap lan operasyonlar s ras nda uygulanan müzikle terapinin hastalarda rahatlamaya neden oldu unu, kan bas nc n dü ürdü ünü ve aritmiyi normalize etti ini bildirmi tir (8).

show abstract

“…Gardner, müzi in esas görevinin hastay rahatlatmak oldu unu belirtmektedir. Birçok hasta için a r y bast ran esas etken ses olmu tur (6).…”

Section: Odyoanaljez Ned R?unclassified

Section: Tekn Kunclassified

Diş Hekimliğinde odyoanaljezi

ASLANTÜRK¹

2014

Ankara Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…66 Light can be an effective counterstimulus to extremity pain. 26 Similarly, sound has been demonstrated to modulate pain, [67][68][69][70] and has been used as a counterstimulus for patients with conditions such as tinnitus and auditory hallucinations. 71,72 Consequently, for some patients treated with sham pads, sound or light could have had primary therapeutic effects.…”

Section: Limitationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Improving sleep for patients with restless legs syndrome. Part II: meta-analysis of vibration therapy and drugs approved by the FDA for treatment of restless legs syndrome

Burbank¹,

Buchfuhrer²,

Kopjar³

et al. 2013

JPRLS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Vibratory stimulation pads have been shown to improve sleep in patients with restless legs syndrome (RLS) to a greater extent than sham therapy. The current gold standard of treatment is drugs approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use in RLS. The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy and safety of vibratory stimulation pads, sham pads, and drugs approved by the FDA for use in RLS. Methods: We searched the PubMed, Embase, and clinical trial websites to identify the relevant randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled or sham-controlled studies. Fifteen studies including a combined total of 3455 patients with at least moderately severe primary RLS met our search criteria. Efficacy was defined as the standardized mean difference in sleep improvement between treatment and controls. Safety was assessed by comparing the odds ratios of any adverse events and adverse events leading to study withdrawal between treatment and control subjects. Results: Improvement in Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) sleep inventory scores from baseline was significantly greater in patients treated with vibratory stimulation pads than in those receiving sham pads (Hedges's g, standardized mean difference −0.39, P # 0.02). There was no difference in improvement in sleep scores between patients treated with vibratory stimulation pads (−0.39) and those receiving an approved RLS drug (−0.44, P . 0.70). The risk of any adverse event or withdrawal because of an adverse event was not significantly different between patients treated with vibratory stimulation pads and those assigned to sham pads (Mantel-Haenszel odds ratio 2.16 [P . 0.14] and 1.39 [P . 0.80], respectively). The odds ratios for patients reporting any adverse events and adverse events leading to withdrawal were not significantly different between patients treated with vibratory stimulation pads (2.16 and 1.39, respectively) and those who received approved RLS drugs (2.11 [P . 0.89] and 2.07 [P . 0.82], respectively, mixed-effects model). Conclusion: For patients with moderately severe RLS, vibratory stimulation pads were more effective than sham pads for improving sleep, as effective as FDA-approved RLS drugs, and as safe as both sham pads and FDA-approved RLS drugs.

show abstract

“…Orienting to a given stimulus or task distracts or inhibits the response to noxious or undesired stimuli (e.g., Gardner, Licklider, Weisz, 1960;Kanfer & Goldfoot, 1966;Smith, 1977). It seems clear to us that the functional characteristics of inhibition induced by ORs are worthy of further experimental and theoretical research.…”

Section: Inhibitionmentioning

confidence: 99%