1982
DOI: 10.3758/bf03332940
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Verbal conditioning, task instructions, and inhibition of the GSR measure of the orienting reflex

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Either of these manipulations could account for the results. That paying attention to the movie may contribute to reduced responding is suggested by the work of Maltzman, Vincent, and Wolff (1982). Those investigators found that when attention was directed to one stimulus in aseries, by requiring a pedalpress to its occurrence, the response to a subsequently presented stimulus was diminished as compared with the responses generated by the same stimuli without the pedalpress requirement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Either of these manipulations could account for the results. That paying attention to the movie may contribute to reduced responding is suggested by the work of Maltzman, Vincent, and Wolff (1982). Those investigators found that when attention was directed to one stimulus in aseries, by requiring a pedalpress to its occurrence, the response to a subsequently presented stimulus was diminished as compared with the responses generated by the same stimuli without the pedalpress requirement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Those investigators found that when attention was directed to one stimulus in aseries, by requiring a pedalpress to its occurrence, the response to a subsequently presented stimulus was diminished as compared with the responses generated by the same stimuli without the pedalpress requirement. Maltzman et al (1982) hypothesized that "a voluntary and effortful focusing of attention towards one event narrows the focus of attention and as a consequence decreases the apprehension of other stimuli" (p. 226). A direct test of this notion in the present study would require another control group in which ignore instructions were omitted but subjects were exhorted to attend to the movie.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a review of the orienting response literature reveals that various theoreticians argued for two types of orienting responses. Specifically, Maltzman and his colleagues (e.g., Maltzman, 1977; Maltzman, Vincent, & Wolff, 1982) made a distinction between voluntary and involuntary orienting responses: the latter is evoked by an unexpected novel stimulus, whereas the former reflects a response to a predictable significant stimulus – a stimulus for which expectations have been formed through instructions. A similar distinction was made by Naatanen (1979), who noted that Sokolov’s (1963) original theory cannot account for the activation of the orienting response by familiar but significant stimuli.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two factors that determine OR according the proposed model may correspond to the two types of OR mentioned by Maltzman and his colleagues (e.g., Maltzman, Gould, Pendry, & Wolff, 1982; Maltzman, Vincent, & Wolff, 1982). They made a distinction between voluntary and involuntary ORs: The latter is evoked by an unexpected novel stimulus, whereas the former reflects a response to a predictable stimulus—a stimulus for which expectations have been formed through instructions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%