2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.04.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supporting land use change assessment through Ecosystem Services and Wildlife Indexes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results suggest that both crops may serve as tools for bioremediation of contaminated soils and their use increase the value of ecosystem services. Similar results were reached by Cervelli, et al [62], including more scenarios and land use change options. Results here show that combining ecological assessment with land use change scenarios provide useful input for future regional development and conservation.…”
Section: Phytoremediation/waste Managementsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Results suggest that both crops may serve as tools for bioremediation of contaminated soils and their use increase the value of ecosystem services. Similar results were reached by Cervelli, et al [62], including more scenarios and land use change options. Results here show that combining ecological assessment with land use change scenarios provide useful input for future regional development and conservation.…”
Section: Phytoremediation/waste Managementsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The LULC dynamics is one of the major impacts on biodiversity persistence (Mantyka‐Pringle et al, ). Many recent studies around the world (Mantyka‐Pringle et al, ; Schulp, Teeffelen, Tucker, & Verburg, ; Eitelberg, Jasper, Jonathan, Elke, & Peter, ; Masum, Asyraf, Shahrul, & Hwee, ; Liu, Lei, Xiaojian, & Peng, ; Chaudhary & Thomas, ; Cervelli et al, ) clearly indicated the negative impacts of LULC change on biodiversity. All of these studies concluded that human‐induced LULC change has exacerbated the loss of habitats and fragmentation of biodiversity by increasing the susceptibility of biological populations to stochastic extinction risk.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In line with our findings, the study by Meshesha et al (2014) reported that an increase in agricultural activities and reduction in grassland have caused lack of available suitable grazing lands, which in turn has caused overgrazing and discouraged the households to raise the large size of animals. Almost all of those interviewed clearly Masum, Asyraf, Shahrul, & Hwee, 2017;Liu, Lei, Xiaojian, & Peng, 2016;Chaudhary & Thomas, 2016;Cervelli et al, 2017) clearly indicated the negative impacts of LULC change on biodiversity. All of these studies concluded that human-induced LULC change has exacerbated the loss of habitats and fragmentation of biodiversity by increasing the susceptibility of biological populations to stochastic extinction risk.…”
Section: Soil Erosion Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, due to the unclear classification of ESs, inadequate understanding of ecosystem complexity, insufficient understanding of complementarity and exclusiveness among multiple ESs, it often results in the repeated calculation of multiple ESs, which finally leads to large differences in assessment results of similar ESs (Fu et al, 2011). Therefore, future research aims to develop a new classification framework for ESs based on land cover types, spatial relationships and regional differences, and to further research towards driving mechanisms of ESs and scenario simulation (Cervelli et al, 2017;Kubiszewski et al, 2017).…”
Section: Limitation and Future Research Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%