2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41893-020-00679-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supporting interdisciplinary careers for sustainability

Abstract: Universities and research centres around the world have made significant progress towards establishing collaborative, interdisciplinary initiatives in sustainability science. However, more needs to be done to support the career development of junior sustainability scholars whose work is often team based and outreach oriented.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the societal expectations of ocean science in the context of the UN Ocean Decade, there should be concern about the misalignment between these expectations and the way scientists are evaluated for their work. Many of the skills required for effective collaboration, such as communication skills, community relationship building, and the open-mindedness to constructively debate, are undervalued in academia (e.g., Lubchenco and Rapley, 2020;Hernández-Aguilera et al, 2021). This acts as a disincentive for scientists contemplating participation in coordination activities, and threatens the continuity of the workforce to sustain ocean observing in the future (National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, 2017; Weller et al, 2019).…”
Section: The Challenges Aheadmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the societal expectations of ocean science in the context of the UN Ocean Decade, there should be concern about the misalignment between these expectations and the way scientists are evaluated for their work. Many of the skills required for effective collaboration, such as communication skills, community relationship building, and the open-mindedness to constructively debate, are undervalued in academia (e.g., Lubchenco and Rapley, 2020;Hernández-Aguilera et al, 2021). This acts as a disincentive for scientists contemplating participation in coordination activities, and threatens the continuity of the workforce to sustain ocean observing in the future (National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, 2017; Weller et al, 2019).…”
Section: The Challenges Aheadmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The highly competitive academic landscape necessitates individuals frequently working long hours on insecure, and sometimes low-paid, contracts, often leading to enduring work-related stress and ill-health (Teferra 2016;Aarnikoivu et al 2019;Salihu Shinkafi 2020;Hernandez-Aguilera et al 2021). ECAs are encouraged to demonstrate their commitment and capabilities across diverse areas: research (through publishing and delivering impact); lecturing and supervision (often with minimal support, or outside contracted responsibilities in order to gain vital experience); and administration/ managerial work (such as taking on PI responsibilities in managing and coordinating projects and personnel).…”
Section: Precarious Labourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and operate across disciplinary boundaries where contrasting identities, research approaches and norms must be negotiated (c.f. Bridle et al 2013;Hein et al 2018;Hernandez-Aguilera et al 2021 on the challenges of interdisciplinary careers for ECAs). This lack of a clear institutional locale makes it difficult for urban ECAs to 'find a disciplinary home' , exchange research ideas with colleagues, establish supportive research networks to enable progression through our desired career pathways, or build solidarity across institutions and disciplines.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their first point, Keeler et al (2017) explicitly address the needs of graduate students who are facing increasingly competitive job markets and a world threatened by environmental catastrophe, and they call for formal training and hybrid skill development to be a part of research programs. This perspective article acknowledges that we, as graduate students, especially those in rigidly disciplinary programs, are often unsupported in working beyond the framing of traditional academic paths and must develop professional skills on our own (Brunson & Baker, 2015; Hernandez‐Aguilera et al, 2021).…”
Section: Recommendations For Institutional Innovationmentioning
confidence: 99%