2018
DOI: 10.4018/ijpada.2018010102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supporting Communities through Social Government in Co-Creation and Co-Production of Public Services

Abstract: Governments are facing demands towards more transparency, better connectivity and collaboration among different actors in public service provisioning. Their constituencies demand that public services better reflect citizens' needs and social innovation. Integrating Internet, Web 2.0, social media and new concepts of open government and community governance bear tremendous potentials for engaging citizens and businesses in co-creation and co-production of public services and therewith addressing their high expe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular along the transition to deliver online public services basing on the OOP, public services need to be designed 'customer-centric by default', encompassing simplification and seamless combinations of service building blocks from different government entities [62] and with the customer's needs at focus. Concepts like co-creation and co-production can help to engage citizens and other stakeholders in the innovation of public service routines [63].…”
Section: Stakeholder Engagementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular along the transition to deliver online public services basing on the OOP, public services need to be designed 'customer-centric by default', encompassing simplification and seamless combinations of service building blocks from different government entities [62] and with the customer's needs at focus. Concepts like co-creation and co-production can help to engage citizens and other stakeholders in the innovation of public service routines [63].…”
Section: Stakeholder Engagementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In her view, citizen power was about a more political discourse of rights, citizenship and urban commons. Citizen power in this framework indicates all participatory forms in which citizens meaningfully influence and (co-)decide about developmental plans (Goodspeed, 2015;Opromolla et al, 2017;Wimmer & Scherer, 2018). It therefore also comprises bottom-up initiatives in which citizens seize technological opportunities for (re)making their city (Aylett, 2013;Breuer et al, 2014;de Vries et al, 2016;Niederer & Priester, 2016).…”
Section: Consultationmentioning
confidence: 99%