2002
DOI: 10.1177/0741713602052002005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Support Systems, Psychological Functioning, and Academic Performance of Nontraditional Female Students

Abstract: Traditional (18-22 years of age) and nontraditional (35-44 years of age)female students were compared on various aspects of their social support systems, child care, psychological functioning (depression and anxiety), and academic performance. Traditional students exhibited poorer psychological functioning when they were less satisfied with their emotional support network. In contrast, psychological functioning within the nontraditional students was independent of the amount and satisfaction with their emotion… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
97
0
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 138 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(56 reference statements)
3
97
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Individuals bring personal resources to university, in the form of commitment and social support, which can enhance well-being (Perrine 2001;Sheard 2009;Carney-Crompton and Tan 2002). Well-being deficits may be balanced by positive aspects of the firstyear student experience such as social and recreational opportunities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individuals bring personal resources to university, in the form of commitment and social support, which can enhance well-being (Perrine 2001;Sheard 2009;Carney-Crompton and Tan 2002). Well-being deficits may be balanced by positive aspects of the firstyear student experience such as social and recreational opportunities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Gene's return from the Iraq War and Ann's broken engagement were significant, life-changing transitions in their lives that coincided with their enrollment at U of L, and such moments of transition have long been cited as a prime factor motivating adults to continue their formal educations (Merriam,Caffarella,Baumgartner,. Likewise, once adult students are enrolled they (generally) have a reputation for being among the hardestworking and highest-performing students in class (Carney-Crompton and Tan, 2002;Kasworm and Pike, 1995;Kevern et aI., 1999;Makinen & Pychyl, 2001). Adult students' reputation for hard work and excellent results is also a major point of convergence in the qualitative data from my study.…”
Section: To Not Be Afraid To Write" Case Study Ii: Ann Winfieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Association of Non-Traditional Students in Higher Education (ANTS HE) estimated that more than 47% of all college students were nontraditional (ANTSHE, 2000). Many researchers (Anderson, 2003;Carney-Crompton & Tan, 2002;City Colleges of Chicago, 2003;Haggan, 2000;Hoachlander, Sikora, & Horn, 2003;Houser, 2002;Justice & Dornan, 2001;KCTCS, 2006) use the designation "age 25 or older" to indicate student populations that are different than traditional college students.…”
Section: Reverse Transfer Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The roles played by reverse transfer students usually carry far more responsibility. Reverse transfer students also usually have less extensive support systems (Carney-Crompton & Tan, 2002). Depending on the marital status of the student and the condition of the student's relationships, a reverse transfer student may have support or stressors in the home (MacKinnon-Slaney, Barber, & Slaney, 1988).…”
Section: Marital Statusmentioning
confidence: 99%