Abstract:Support groups have become a part of the lives of many people who suffer from illness and injury. Physicians and other healthcare professionals often recommend them to patients and families dealing with medical conditions, and many support groups are diagnosis specific. The members of five support groups were surveyed to determine the factors that influenced their decision to participate. They reported they attended the groups to meet others with the same diagnosis and to gain more information about the diagno… Show more
“…Our findings are consistent with studies amongst young people with diabetes and disability which describe how membership of support groups enabled opportunities for bonding with others similar to themselves, and how this increased a sense of belonging . In studies of adults’ with a wide variety of conditions including allergy, cancer, stroke, diabetes, and physical disabilities, benefits of patient groups are also consistent with our findings suggesting that irrespective of the underlying condition or age, support groups appear to promote a sense of community, acceptance and emotional benefit, increased self‐confidence and a decrease in isolation . Previous research has found that supportive networks lead to decreased engagement in risky behaviours, increased knowledge regarding management and an increase in treatment adherence and positive behaviours .…”
Participants valued the psychological and practical support of networking with others with allergies, and described how membership improved their confidence. This study also provides insight into the ways support groups improve young people's adherence to medical advice and positive self-care behaviours; participants responded well to hard-hitting video campaigns which appeared to emphasize the severity and susceptibility of anaphylaxis. Participants identified the need for more active promotion of support groups amongst young people and their clinicians, as well as making them available in more localities.
“…Our findings are consistent with studies amongst young people with diabetes and disability which describe how membership of support groups enabled opportunities for bonding with others similar to themselves, and how this increased a sense of belonging . In studies of adults’ with a wide variety of conditions including allergy, cancer, stroke, diabetes, and physical disabilities, benefits of patient groups are also consistent with our findings suggesting that irrespective of the underlying condition or age, support groups appear to promote a sense of community, acceptance and emotional benefit, increased self‐confidence and a decrease in isolation . Previous research has found that supportive networks lead to decreased engagement in risky behaviours, increased knowledge regarding management and an increase in treatment adherence and positive behaviours .…”
Participants valued the psychological and practical support of networking with others with allergies, and described how membership improved their confidence. This study also provides insight into the ways support groups improve young people's adherence to medical advice and positive self-care behaviours; participants responded well to hard-hitting video campaigns which appeared to emphasize the severity and susceptibility of anaphylaxis. Participants identified the need for more active promotion of support groups amongst young people and their clinicians, as well as making them available in more localities.
“…Reduced social interaction and social isolation is common after TBI and has a significant impact on quality of life (Dahlberg et al, 2006;Hoofien, Gilboa, Vakil, & Donovick, 2001;McDonald et al, 2008;Struchen et al, 2011;Temkin, Corrigan, Dikmen, & Machamer, 2009). Consistent with previous research, this study reinforces the value of the social interactions and support that groups can provide (Charles et al, 2007;Fleming et al, 2009;Fraas et al, 2007;Nilsson et al, 2011;Parente & Stapleton, 1999;Purk, 2004;Rodgers et al, 2007;Sargeant et al, 2000;Schulz, 1994;S. Schwartzberg, 1994;Straits-Troster et al, 2013;Vandiver & Christofero-Snider, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Results of these studies were generally consistent with each other, and with findings of other quantitative and mixed-method studies. These concluded that group interventions provided opportunities for social interaction and support (Charles et al, 2007;Fleming et al, 2009;Fraas et al, 2007;Nilsson et al, 2011;Parente & Stapleton, 1999;Purk, 2004;Rodgers et al, 2007;Sargeant et al, 2000;Schulz, 1994;S. Schwartzberg, 1994;Straits-Troster et al, 2013;Vandiver & Christofero-Snider, 2000), and could provide opportunities to simulate real world interactions (Knis-Matthews et al, 2006;Lundqvist et al, 2010;Newman & Newstadt, 2009;Niemeier et al, 2010;Sargeant et al, 2000;Smalley et al, 2007;Vandiver & Christofero-Snider, 2000).…”
Section: Examination Of Clinician Perceptions Of Group Therapy Intervmentioning
Background: Groups are an integral part of everyday life. Some groups are chosen by participants whereas membership in other groups may not be an active choice.The benefits of participation in groups are widely documented, and perhaps most commonly cited are Yalom's eleven curative factors of group therapy, examples of which include the instillation of hope and imparting of knowledge. Groups have long been used therapeutically and are increasingly used as a context for delivery of rehabilitation interventions. Following a traumatic brain injury (TBI), rehabilitation is recommended to maximise recovery and the use of groups in TBI rehabilitation programmes is common practice, particularly in occupational therapy. TBI results in a complex variety of impairments that can interfere with an individual's ability to participate in their life roles and activities. Therefore, groups in TBI rehabilitation may pose some unique challenges for facilitators. Currently there is limited research evidence to guide clinicians in the facilitation of groups with this population group. In addition, there is limited literature investigating key stakeholder's perspectives of group participation in TBI rehabilitation. The purpose of this thesis is to explore processes and perspectives of participation in inpatient occupational therapy groups in TBI rehabilitation.Objectives: The aims were 1) to scope the current state of evidence regarding the use of groups in rehabilitation following TBI; 2) to explore the perspectives of patients with TBI about participation in inpatient occupational therapy groups; 3) to investigate the perspectives of clinicians from multiple rehabilitation settings about facilitation of groups with patients following TBI; and 4) to explore the nature of interactions in inpatient occupational therapy groups in TBI rehabilitation.Method: A mixed methods approach was used. The primary components of the thesis were a scoping review, focus groups with clinician participants, questionnaires and individual interviews with patient participants, and video-recordings of inpatient occupational therapy groups. A total of 46 rehabilitation inpatients recruited from the occupational therapy groups programme at the hospital participated in the study, with fifteen completing individual interviews. Twenty-two clinicians and four student iii clinicians who worked in inpatient occupational therapy teams in brain injury, spinal cord injury and geriatric rehabilitation settings from one hospital participated in the study. The thesis explored the experiences and perspectives of participants and was guided by a phenomenological approach. The method of qualitative analysis for focus groups was framework analysis. Thematic content analysis was utilised to analyse interview data. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse questionnaire data. Qualitative analysis guided by qualitative description was used to analyse video data.Results: The scoping review concluded that existing research about the use of groups in TBI rehabilitation consiste...
“…Social capital, on the other hand, can also increase people’s chances to accumulate health-relevant cultural capital, for instance through informal access to health information, expert knowledge and advice. Memberships in networks or social groups such as patient’s organisations, neighbourhood initiatives and self-help groups have been found to improve health knowledge 41 42. Thus the acquisition of health-relevant cultural capital is in major parts directly dependent on the availability of other types of resources, namely economic and social capital.…”
Section: Cultural Capital: Interactions and Transformations Relevant mentioning
Economic and social resources are known to contribute to the unequal distribution of health outcomes. Culture-related factors such as normative beliefs, knowledge and behaviours have also been shown to be associated with health status. The role and function of cultural resources in the unequal distribution of health is addressed. Drawing on the work of French Sociologist Pierre Bourdieu, the concept of cultural capital for its contribution to the current understanding of social inequalities in health is explored. It is suggested that class related cultural resources interact with economic and social capital in the social structuring of people's health chances and choices. It is concluded that cultural capital is a key element in the behavioural transformation of social inequality into health inequality. New directions for empirical research on the interplay between economic, social and cultural capital are outlined.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.