Support for Free Trade: Self-Interest, Sociotropic Politics, and Out-Group Anxiety

Abstract

Although it is widely acknowledged that an understanding of mass attitudes about trade is crucial to the political economy of foreign commerce, only a handful of studies have addressed this topic. These studies have focused largely on testing two models, both of which emphasize that trade preferences are shaped by how trade affects an individual's income. The factor endowments or Heckscher-Ohlin model posits that these preferences are affected primarily by a person's skills. The specific factors or Ricardo-Viner model posits that trade preferences depend on the industry in which a person works. We find little support for either of these models using two representative national surveys of Americans. The only potential exception involves the effects of education. Initial tests indicate that educational attainment and support for open trade are directly related, which is often interpreted as support for the Heckscher-Ohlin model. However, further analysis reveals that education's effects are less representative of skill than of individuals' anxieties about involvement with out-groups in their own country and beyond. Furthermore, we find strong evidence that trade attitudes are guided less by material self-interest than by perceptions of how the U.S. economy as a whole is affected by trade. Disciplines AbstractAlthough it is widely acknowledged that an understanding of mass attitudes about trade is crucial to the political economy of foreign commerce, only a handful of studies have addressed this topic+ These studies have focused largely on testing two models, both of which emphasize that trade preferences are shaped by how trade affects an individual's income+ The factor endowments or HeckscherOhlin model posits that these preferences are affected primarily by a person's skills+ The specific factors or Ricardo-Viner model posits that trade preferences depend on the industry in which a person works+ We find little support for either of these models using two representative national surveys of Americans+ The only potential exception involves the effects of education+ Initial tests indicate that educational attainment and support for open trade are directly related, which is often interpreted as support for the Heckscher-Ohlin model+ However, further analysis reveals that education's effects are less representative of skill than of individuals' anxieties about involvement with out-groups in their own country and beyond+ Furthermore, we find strong evidence that trade attitudes are guided less by material self-interest than by perceptions of how the U+S+ economy as a whole is affected by trade+The politics of international trade has been a long-standing puzzle for social scientists+ Among economists, there is widespread agreement that free trade is beneficial+ 1 Open trade and cross-national market integration help to allocate factors of production efficiently and to promote the welfare of countries and the world as

Public Opinion and Foreign Aid: A Review Essay

“…Workers in professional sectors and those with higher incomes favor more aid, which is consistent with views stressing the role of economic endowments in explaining preferences. Of course, this engages a larger debate on other issue areas, like trade, about whether education is a good proxy for capital endowments (Fordham and Kleinberg 2012;Hainmueller and Hiscox 2006;Mansfield and Mutz 2009).…”

US versus Them: Mass Attitudes toward Offshore Outsourcing

“…first, how does the American 32 Johnson 1965, 183. 33 mansfield andmutz 2009. public understand what constitutes outsourcing? Second, are Americans' attitudes toward outsourcing essentially the same as their attitudes toward trade?…”

Immigration, Integration, and Support for Redistribution in Europe

“…20 In short, immigration might heighten collective or individual insecurities to boost rather than burden the political sustainability of redistribution.…”