2017
DOI: 10.1177/1368430217722037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Support for Anonymous as vicarious dissent: Testing the social banditry framework

Abstract: This research uses the social banditry framework to propose that voiceless individuals in an unjust context may express their grievances vicariously. Specifically, it holds that individuals who perceive the system as unjust but lack political efficacy, express their anger against the system as support for actors whose behavior disrupts the system's functioning. These actors are situated outside conventional societal and political structures of power, and institutions. To test the social banditry framework, two… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
52
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
5
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The scree-plot indicated a four-factor solution emerged in each country explaining 52% of the variance in the United States sample, and 43% of the variance in the South Korean sample. Similar to a recent study using this scale in the Northern American context ( Travaglino, 2017 ), items assessing each of the four constructs loaded highly on the expected factor, except the item “ My happiness depends very much on the happiness of those around me ” which loaded on VC in the United States sample (rotated factor loading 0.34) rather than HC. Similarly, in the South Korean sample, the item loaded on VC (0.49) rather than HC.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The scree-plot indicated a four-factor solution emerged in each country explaining 52% of the variance in the United States sample, and 43% of the variance in the South Korean sample. Similar to a recent study using this scale in the Northern American context ( Travaglino, 2017 ), items assessing each of the four constructs loaded highly on the expected factor, except the item “ My happiness depends very much on the happiness of those around me ” which loaded on VC in the United States sample (rotated factor loading 0.34) rather than HC. Similarly, in the South Korean sample, the item loaded on VC (0.49) rather than HC.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 65%
“…For instance, in the Korean society (VC), some people may still endorse values of self-reliance, uniqueness and equality which are related to horizontal individualism. Moreover, in a society such as the United States (VI), some people may still endorse values of cooperation and interdependence related to horizontal collectivism ( Travaglino, 2017 ). Thus, it is important to investigate under which circumstances individuals are more likely to express personal cultural tendencies that run against the cultural normative theme.…”
Section: Cultural Contexts Personal Cultural Tendencies and Individmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, we proposed that belief that immigration levels were too high in combination with mistrust of UK politicians would amplify perceived threat from immigration and weaken European identification, thereby mobilizing intentions to vote to leave the European Uniona combination of exit from the status quo but expressing political voice to gain control over the change (cf. Arndt, 2015; see also Travaglino, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Although the loot has certainly a small economic value, it may be construed as a form of rebellion against the poor salaries the workers receive (cf. Travaglino, 2017b). The migrants involved in the harvest see as justifiable to take away something for themselves.…”
Section: Struggle Strategies ¥ Extract 10mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…psychological resistance is extremely important because it enables individuals to put forward systems of values and meanings alternative to those used by the dominant groups, build new identities and ultimately achieve social change (Gramsci, 1971;Leach & Livingstone, 2015;Scott, 1990;Travaglino, 2017b).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%