2019
DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02159
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supply of Methionine During Late-Pregnancy Alters Fecal Microbiota and Metabolome in Neonatal Dairy Calves Without Changes in Daily Feed Intake

Abstract: To our knowledge, most studies demonstrating the role of manipulating maternal nutrition on hindgut (i.e., large intestine) microbiota in the offspring have been performed in non-ruminants. Whether this phenomenon exists in cattle is largely unknown. Therefore, the objectives of the current study were to evaluate the impact of maternal post-ruminal supply of methionine during late-pregnancy in dairy cows on fecal microbiota and metabolome in neonatal calves, and their association with body development and grow… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 107 publications
(117 reference statements)
2
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The supervised partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) score plot for the QC samples ( Supplemental Figure 1 ) showed the tight clustering of the QC samples indicating the precise outcome from the metabolites process. Metabolites peak intensities were normalized by the sum of all identified metabolites ( 33 ) and log transformed prior to multivariate statistical analysis ( 34 ). The PLS-DA score plots were used to see the overall difference between metabolite profiles of HM and MF groups followed by Pattern Hunter analysis in MetaboAnalyst to detect the significant differences in metabolites between groups.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The supervised partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) score plot for the QC samples ( Supplemental Figure 1 ) showed the tight clustering of the QC samples indicating the precise outcome from the metabolites process. Metabolites peak intensities were normalized by the sum of all identified metabolites ( 33 ) and log transformed prior to multivariate statistical analysis ( 34 ). The PLS-DA score plots were used to see the overall difference between metabolite profiles of HM and MF groups followed by Pattern Hunter analysis in MetaboAnalyst to detect the significant differences in metabolites between groups.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PLS-DA score plots were used to see the overall difference between metabolite profiles of HM and MF groups followed by Pattern Hunter analysis in MetaboAnalyst to detect the significant differences in metabolites between groups. A metabolite was considered to be statistically different when P - value ≤ 0.05, Benjamini-Hochberg adjusted false discovery rate (FDR) ≤ 0.15, and variable importance in projection (VIP) score > 1.0 ( 34 , 35 ). Based on the identification of the significantly altered metabolites in HM and MF-fed groups, we calculated the fold change (FC) for each metabolite.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Total metagenomic DNA was subjected to Fluidigm Access Array Amplification (Fluidigm Corporation, South San Francisco, CA, USA) for DNA amplification. The V3-V4 hyper-variable region of 16S rRNA gene was sequenced with the Illumina MiSeq V2 platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) to obtain pairedend reads of 250 bp [18]. Data quality filters on the raw microbiome sequences were applied with Illumina software.…”
Section: Rectal and Fecal Dna Extraction 16s Rrna Gene Amplificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The raw data were checked for data integrity, and no missing values were detected after the peak's filtration. Data were normalized by sum of all identified metabolites in rowwise procedures allowing adjustment for differences among samples (64), autoscaling (mean-centered and divided by standard deviation of each variable), and log transformation prior to downstream statistical analysis (65). Multivariate analysis was performed using supervised partial least-squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%