2009
DOI: 10.1080/00207540902960299
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supply chain design and cost analysis through simulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The relative importance of the globalization aspects has decreased while the number of papers devoted to environmental aspects and reverse (5) Altmann (2014), Brandenburg (2015), Cui (2015), Klibi and Martel (2012) Note: The number of papers for each specific problem is given in parenthesis. See key from Table 3.1 for abbreviations 3.4 Focus Areas for Supply Chain Configuration (7) Brandenburg (2015), Castellano et al (2013), Petridis (2015), Tian and Yue (2014), Tiacci et al (2014), You and Grossmann (2008), Zokaee et al (2014) ENV (9) Altmann ( (7) Baghalian et al (2013), Bassett and Gardner (2013), Habermann et al (2015), Hearnshaw and Wilson (2013), Klibi and Martel (2012), Madadi et al (2014), Mizgier et al (2015) RL (12) Amin and Zhang (2012), Chaabane et al (2012), Das and Rao Posinasetti (2015), Ghayebloo et al (2015), Kara and Onut (2010), Metta andBadurdeen (2013), Quariguasi Frota Neto et al (2008), Ramezani et al (2013), Ramezani et al (2014), Santibanez-Gonzalez and, Soleimani et al (2013), Vahdani and Naderi-Beni (2014) RP (6) Akanle and Zhang (2008), Bottani andMontanari (2010), Cheung et al (2012), Jamshidi et al (2015), Vanteddu et al (2011), You and…”
Section: Focus Areas For Supply Chain Configurationmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The relative importance of the globalization aspects has decreased while the number of papers devoted to environmental aspects and reverse (5) Altmann (2014), Brandenburg (2015), Cui (2015), Klibi and Martel (2012) Note: The number of papers for each specific problem is given in parenthesis. See key from Table 3.1 for abbreviations 3.4 Focus Areas for Supply Chain Configuration (7) Brandenburg (2015), Castellano et al (2013), Petridis (2015), Tian and Yue (2014), Tiacci et al (2014), You and Grossmann (2008), Zokaee et al (2014) ENV (9) Altmann ( (7) Baghalian et al (2013), Bassett and Gardner (2013), Habermann et al (2015), Hearnshaw and Wilson (2013), Klibi and Martel (2012), Madadi et al (2014), Mizgier et al (2015) RL (12) Amin and Zhang (2012), Chaabane et al (2012), Das and Rao Posinasetti (2015), Ghayebloo et al (2015), Kara and Onut (2010), Metta andBadurdeen (2013), Quariguasi Frota Neto et al (2008), Ramezani et al (2013), Ramezani et al (2014), Santibanez-Gonzalez and, Soleimani et al (2013), Vahdani and Naderi-Beni (2014) RP (6) Akanle and Zhang (2008), Bottani andMontanari (2010), Cheung et al (2012), Jamshidi et al (2015), Vanteddu et al (2011), You and…”
Section: Focus Areas For Supply Chain Configurationmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…With regards to the input data used in this scenario, it should be mentioned that the average values are in line with typical figures of the moving consumer goods field (cf. Bottani and Montanari 2010). However, such data are not expected to represent any specific real system; rather, they are merely proposed as an example for validating the model developed in this paper.…”
Section: Mdpaeoq Validation Under Scenariomentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Analysis is centred on the evaluation of the effects of different configurations on the resulting total supply chain performance. Decision criteria that have been used include supply chains costs, the bullwhip effect, quality improvement initiatives, lead time reduction and environmental impacts (Bottani and Montannari 2010). MCDA is the predominant method used to support the green supply chain design decision-making, but there are some pilot investigations integrating MCDA and LCA for a more robust decision analysis.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%