Supplementation of Wheat Straw Diets to Optimize Performance of Wintering Beef Cows

Males, J. R.; McReynolds, William E.; Gaskins, C. T.; Preston, R. L.

doi:10.2527/jas1982.542384x

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The SBM effect on GE digestibility was greater than expected and may have been due to the additional protein promoting improved fibre digestion in the rumen. This effect is frequently observed with lower quality roughages (Males et al 1982;Alawa et al 1986). Based on the negative N balance observed in steers fed the unsupplemented mixture, it is reasonable to expect that protein may have been limiting ruminal digestion.…”

Section: Discussion Diet Composition Digestibility and N Balancementioning

confidence: 82%

The partial replacement of silage with straw, with or without barley or soybean meal, in rations for winter calving beef cows

Duynisveld¹

2004

Can. J. Anim. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Charmley, E. and Duynisveld, J. L. 2004. The partial replacement of silage with straw, with or without barley or soybean meal, in rations for winter calving beef cows. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 84: 245-253. The effects of partially replacing grass-legume silage with barley straw, without or with either supplemental energy or protein, were assessed in 72 lactating beef cows. Diets were fed from calving in January-February until turnout to pasture in late May. Performance of cows and their calves was measured over this period, and weight and body condition were measured at weaning in September. Apparent digestibility and N balance of these diets was also assessed in growing steers. Replacing half the silage with barley straw reduced diet digestibility (P < 0.05), intake (P < 0.05), body weight (BW) gain (P < 0.001) and body condition (P < 0.001) of cows but did not affect BW gain or weaning weights of calves. Reproductive performance was also unaffected, although overall production efficiency (kg weaned calf kg -1 cow BW) was impaired (P < 0.10). When the silage-straw diet was supplemented with barley, metabolizable energy (ME) intake was increased to the level supplied by the all-silage diet. However, there was a tendency for cows to partition more ME to calf growth and less to body reserves as indicated by body condition score (P < 0.05). This may have been related to better N utilization, since N losses in urine were lower for steers fed the barley-supplemented mixture than those fed silage (P < 0.01). When the silage-straw was supplemented with soybean meal (SBM) to increase crude protein (CP) to equal the all-silage diet, there were no benefits for the cow or calf, because SBM reduced intake relative to silage fed alone (P < 0.001). Thus, although supplementing with SBM improved N balance, relative to silage (P < 0.01), there was no response in calf performance, probably because of insufficient ME intake in the cow. Although silage appears not to be well balanced for the nutrient requirements of lactating beef cows, attempts to optimise nutrient supply did not markedly improve growth performance of the calf or reproductive performance of the cow. Les rations ont été servies du vêlage, en janvier-février, à la mise à l'herbe à la fin de mai. Durant toute cette période, on a mesuré le rendement des vaches et de leurs veaux, puis établi leur poids et leur état d'engraissement au sevrage, en septembre. On a aussi évalué la digestibilité apparente et le bilan azoté des rations pour les bouvillons en croissance. Lorsqu'on remplace la moitié de l'ensilage par de la paille d'orge, on note une baisse de la digestibilité de la ration (P < 0,05), de la prise d'aliments (P < 0,05), du gain de poids (P < 0,001) et de l'état d'engraissement (P < 0,001) des vaches, sans incidence sur le gain de poids et le poids au sevrage des veaux. Les aptitudes à la reproduction ne sont pas touchées, bien que le rendement global (kg de poids du veau sevré par kg de poids de la vache) diminue. Quand on enrichit le mélange d'ensilage et de paille...

show abstract

Section: Discussion Diet Composition Digestibility and N Balancementioning

confidence: 82%