Supplement to a critique of Piron's system of questions and propositions

Thieffine, F.; Hadjisavvas, Nicolas; Mugur-Schächter, Mioara

doi:10.1007/bf00726941

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Introduction2

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

1984

2003

Publication Types

Select...

Article5

Book1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent6

Authors

Journals

Cited by 9 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…We will go over remarks and critiques aimed at OQL. Indeed, in the papers [4,17,21,38], the work of C. Piron has been criticised. Many of these criticisms were merely misunderstandings.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

In defense of operational quantum logic

Smets¹

2003

LLP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the literature the work of C. Piron on OQL, "the operational quantum logic of the Geneva School", has a few times been criticised. Those criticisms were often due to misunderstandings, as has already been pointed out in [19]. In this paper we follow the line of defense in favour of OQL by replying to the criticisms formulated some time ago in [4] and [17]. In order for the reader to follow our argumentation, we briefly analyze the basic conceptual machinery of OQL.

show abstract

“…We will go over remarks and critiques aimed at OQL. Indeed, in the papers [4,17,21,38], the work of C. Piron has been criticised. Many of these criticisms were merely misunderstandings.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Foulis and C.H. Randall in [19] replied explicitly to the criticisms formulated in [21,38]. 1 In this reply, they exhibited a lot of possible pitfalls one might run into when learning about OQL.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%