2012
DOI: 10.1002/acs.2296
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supervisory fault‐tolerant control with mutual performance optimization

Abstract: The problem of active fault-tolerant control with reconfiguration mechanism for uncertain linear systems with external disturbances is addressed applying the supervisory control approach. A key feature of the proposed approach is establishment of a set of conditions providing mutual performance in the sense of taking into account the interaction of the fault detection, isolation, and accommodation subsystems in order to achieve global fault-tolerance performance with guaranteed global stability. The efficiency… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
46
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Passive FTC relies on robust control concepts, whereas active FTC methods act on the system component failures actively by redesigning the controller so that the stability and acceptable performance of the entire system is maintained. The most famous active FTC strategies are the pseudoinverse methods (Bajpai, Chang, & Lau, 2001;Caglayan, Allen, & Wehmuller, 1988;Gao & Antsaklis, 1991;Ostroff, 1985), recently revisited by Staroswiecki (2005), the Linear Quadratic (LQ) approach (Josh, 1987;Looze, Weiss, Eterno, & Barett, 1985;Staroswiecki, Yang, & Jiang, 2007;Veillette, 1995), the EA technique (Jiang, 1994;Zhang & Jiang, 2001;Zhao & Jiang, 1998), the adaptive control approach (Bodson & Groszkiewicz, 1997;Tao, Chen, & Joshi, 2002;Zhang, Parisini, & Polycarpou, 2004), the Model Predictive Control (MPC) approach (Camacho & Bordons, 1999;Hartley, Trodden, Richards, & Maciejowski, 2012;Maciejowski, 2002), and most recently the supervisory approach (Efimov, Cieslak, & Henry, 2013;Yang, Jiang, & Cocquempot, 2012).…”
Section: Related Work and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Passive FTC relies on robust control concepts, whereas active FTC methods act on the system component failures actively by redesigning the controller so that the stability and acceptable performance of the entire system is maintained. The most famous active FTC strategies are the pseudoinverse methods (Bajpai, Chang, & Lau, 2001;Caglayan, Allen, & Wehmuller, 1988;Gao & Antsaklis, 1991;Ostroff, 1985), recently revisited by Staroswiecki (2005), the Linear Quadratic (LQ) approach (Josh, 1987;Looze, Weiss, Eterno, & Barett, 1985;Staroswiecki, Yang, & Jiang, 2007;Veillette, 1995), the EA technique (Jiang, 1994;Zhang & Jiang, 2001;Zhao & Jiang, 1998), the adaptive control approach (Bodson & Groszkiewicz, 1997;Tao, Chen, & Joshi, 2002;Zhang, Parisini, & Polycarpou, 2004), the Model Predictive Control (MPC) approach (Camacho & Bordons, 1999;Hartley, Trodden, Richards, & Maciejowski, 2012;Maciejowski, 2002), and most recently the supervisory approach (Efimov, Cieslak, & Henry, 2013;Yang, Jiang, & Cocquempot, 2012).…”
Section: Related Work and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FTC is currently an important research area as testified by several recent papers, see e.g. [5] and references therein.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To handle these faults and make the failed robot Efimov et al, 2013;Patton et al, 2012;Yu and Jiang, 2015;Franzè et al, 2015;Hamayun et al, 2015;Yang and Maciejowski, 2015;Rotondo et al, 2015;Bilski and Wojciechowski, 2016;Hassanabadi et al, 2016). As for the application to wheeled mobile robots, some fault diagnosis methods are developed (e.g., Fourlas et al, 2015;Goel et al, 2000;Skoundrianos and Tzafestas, 2004), a sensor fault accommodation scheme is presented by Ji and Sarkar (2007), some fault-tolerant control systems are designed by Koh et al (2012), Zhang and Cocquempot (2014), Rotondo et al (2014), Kim et al (2015), and Aref et al (2015) for four-wheel drive robots, and a hybrid fault adaptive control scheme is designed by Ji et al (2003) to accommodate partial faults and degradation for two-wheel drive (2WD) mobile robots.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%