2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.conengprac.2011.04.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supervisory control of hybrid powertrains: An experimental benchmark of offline optimization and online energy management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results for the benchmark tests are shown in Table 4. For both tested cycles the controller performs relatively well and is close to the solution predicted by HOT, described in [5]. The results are within 3.6% in fuel consumption.…”
Section: Tablesupporting
confidence: 73%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The results for the benchmark tests are shown in Table 4. For both tested cycles the controller performs relatively well and is close to the solution predicted by HOT, described in [5]. The results are within 3.6% in fuel consumption.…”
Section: Tablesupporting
confidence: 73%
“…A common strategy when using ECMS is to adapt the equivalence factor according to an affine function of the SOC error [2,5]. Here, for robustness reasons, another approach is used.…”
Section: Equivalence Factor Adaptationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The control of the power flows among these devices is commonly referred to as the energy management or supervisory control [1]. There are many approaches [2] to design an energy management strategy, covering heuristic approaches [3][4][5][6] as well as optimization-based approaches, such as deterministic dynamic programming (DP) [7][8][9][10][11][12][13], Pontryagin's minimum principle (PMP) [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] and stochastic dynamic programming (SDP) [22][23][24][25][26]. Recently, convex optimization [27] has attracted attention in the research field of energy management for HEVs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%