Supervisor trainees' and their supervisors' perceptions of attainment of knowledge and skills: An empirical evaluation of a psychotherapy supervisor training programme

Abstract

Objectives This study aimed to evaluate the success of a two-year, part-time training programme for psychotherapy supervisors. A second aim was to examine factors that might contribute to perceived knowledge and skills attainment during the training course.Design This is a naturalistic, longitudinal study where several measures are used to examine group process and outcome.Methods Supervisor trainees' (n=21) and their facilitators' (n=6) ratings of learning (knowledge and skills), relations to the supervisor and supervision group, usage of the group, and supervisor style were completed at three time points. ResultsThe findings suggested that both trainees and their supervisors perceived that the trainees attained a substantial amount of knowledge and skills during the course. In accordance with the literature and expectations, the regression analysis suggested a strong negative association between a strong focus on group processes in the initial and middle phases of the training and perceived knowledge and skills attainment in the final phase of the training. The expected, positive role of relations among trainees in the supervision group in the first half of the training and perceived knowledge and skills attainment in the final part of the training was obtained, whilst the hypothesized significance of the relationship between trainee and supervisor did not receive support. ConclusionsThe supervisory course seemed to provide a training that allowed trainees to attain knowledge and skills that are necessary for psychotherapy supervisors. The results of this pilot study also emphasize the need of more research on learning in the context of group supervision in psychotherapy.

A training outline for conducting psychotherapy process ratings: An example using therapist technique

“…The purpose of this study is to demonstrate that psychotherapy researchers can utilise this training module with various process measures, the CPPS being used as merely one example. These results are consistent with Sundin, Ogren, and Boethius () in that they suggested that directive, active, and structured training is related to greater training benefit and in this case higher reliabilities on process measures.…”

Clinical supervisor training in Australia: A review of current problems and possible solutions

“…In Australia, the Supervisor Training and Accreditation Program (O'Donovan, Dooley, Kavanagh, & Melville, 2009) has resulted in over 1000 psychologist supervisors receiving a 2-day workshop since 2004, with evidence that it is associated with high levels of participant satisfaction (86% endorsement of the workshop, overall) and significant increases in evaluations of knowledge about supervision and the use of a range of supervision methods. From Sweden, Sundin, Ogren, and Boethius (2008) reported on a psychotherapy supervisors' training programme. Although the numbers involved are more modest (e.g.…”

Implications of an Individualized Admission Selection Procedure for Psychotherapy Training in Professional Programs in Psychology

“…It is reasonable to assume that he or she was able to assess his or her supervisees fairly well. Because of the paucity of instruments to evaluate group supervision in psychotherapy (for a review, see Sundin, Ö gren, & Boalt Boëthius, 2008), this research uses instruments that are developed specifically for this purpose. The limited knowledge of the instruments' psychometric properties suggests that the results of this study need to be treated carefully.…”