The 2011 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks 2011
DOI: 10.1109/ijcnn.2011.6033513
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supervised link prediction in weighted networks

Abstract: Abstract-Link prediction is an important task in Social Network Analysis. This problem refers to predicting the emergence of future relationships between nodes in a social network. Our work focuses on a supervised machine learning strategy for link prediction. Here, the target attribute is a class label indicating the existence or absence of a link between a node pair. The predictor attributes are metrics computed from the network structure, describing the given pair. The majority of works for supervised predi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(45 reference statements)
0
37
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The same features are used by all methods, with the only difference being the weights on the network links. In this article, we compare the proposed method LPSF with alternate weighting schemes, such as the number of co-authored papers, as suggested in [22]. We see that in both DBLP datasets, Unweighted, Weighted and LPSF perform almost equally under Precision, though LPSF performs somewhat worse for some classifiers (Random Forest and Naive Bayes).…”
Section: Varying the Number Of Social Featuresmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The same features are used by all methods, with the only difference being the weights on the network links. In this article, we compare the proposed method LPSF with alternate weighting schemes, such as the number of co-authored papers, as suggested in [22]. We see that in both DBLP datasets, Unweighted, Weighted and LPSF perform almost equally under Precision, though LPSF performs somewhat worse for some classifiers (Random Forest and Naive Bayes).…”
Section: Varying the Number Of Social Featuresmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…De Sá and Prudêncio investigated the use of weights to improve the performance of supervised link prediction [22]. In their work, they extend eight benchmark unsupervised metrics for weighted networks, and adopt prediction scores as node pairs' attributes for a supervised classification model.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As previously mentioned, the starting point of this approach is to extract the values/scores of different measures that indicate the similarity between pairs of nodes. These scores can be used either by unsupervised (Liben-Nowell et al, 2003;Lu & Zhou, 2011;Murata & Moriyasu, 2008) or supervised link prediction (Hasan et al, 2006;Lichtenwalter, Lussier, & Chawla, 2010;Sá & Prudêncio, 2011). In the former approach, a proximity measure is chosen and deployed to rank node pairs in the network.…”
Section: Link Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%