2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-12188-8_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Link Prediction in Heterogeneous Collaboration Networks

Abstract: Abstract. Traditional link prediction techniques primarily focus on the effect of potential linkages on the local network neighborhood or the paths between nodes. In this article, we study both supervised and unsupervised link prediction in networks where instances can simultaneously belong to multiple communities, engendering different types of collaborations. Links in these networks arise from heterogeneous causes, limiting the performance of predictors that treat all links homogeneously. To solve this probl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(59 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We used the author’s affiliation available in the WoS database, and an additional Google search was performed in its absence [ 33 ]. The removal of these ambiguities is necessary since they impair bibliometric analyses such as co-authorial link predictions [ 34 ], collaborative network analysis [ 35 ], and citation network analysis [ 36 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used the author’s affiliation available in the WoS database, and an additional Google search was performed in its absence [ 33 ]. The removal of these ambiguities is necessary since they impair bibliometric analyses such as co-authorial link predictions [ 34 ], collaborative network analysis [ 35 ], and citation network analysis [ 36 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The principle of PA is that the more links one already has, the greater the likelihood of new links being generated between that node pair [25]. Redefined as:…”
Section: Similarity Indicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our work, we only use network-based features, since those are the easiest to generalize across different types of networks; both proximity and aggregated features require more feature engineering to transfer to different datasets. Wang and Sukthankar [11] promoted the importance of social features in both supervised and unsupervised link prediction; social features aim to express the community membership of nodes and can be used to construct alternate distance metrics. However we believe that rate generalizes better across different types of dynamic networks; moreover it can be easily combined with dataset-specific feature sets.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approaches to the link prediction problem are commonly categorized as being unsupervised [4,7,[11][12][13] or supervised [8,[14][15][16]. In unsupervised approaches, pairs of non connected nodes are initially ranked according to a chosen similarity metric (for instance, the number of common neighbors) [17,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%