2004
DOI: 10.1136/jcp.2004.017368
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supervised automated microscopy increases sensitivity and efficiency of detection of sentinel node micrometastases in patients with breast cancer

Abstract: Aims: To investigate the practicality and sensitivity of supervised automated microscopy (AM) for the detection of micrometastasis in sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) from patients with breast carcinoma. Methods: In total, 440 SLN slides (immunohistochemically stained for cytokeratin) from 86 patients were obtained from two hospitals. Samples were selected on the basis of: (1) a pathology report mentioning micrometastases or isolated tumour cells (ITCs) and (2) reported as negative nodes (N0). Results: From a test … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Adjuncts to the conventional human assessment of specimens have been shown to be effective. Mesker et al [24] demonstrated that supervised automated microscopy can increase the sensitivity and efficiency of detection of SLN MM and Weaver et al [25] have described the utility of automated computer-assisted image analysis. [29].…”
Section: Analysis Of the Sentinel Lymph Nodementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adjuncts to the conventional human assessment of specimens have been shown to be effective. Mesker et al [24] demonstrated that supervised automated microscopy can increase the sensitivity and efficiency of detection of SLN MM and Weaver et al [25] have described the utility of automated computer-assisted image analysis. [29].…”
Section: Analysis Of the Sentinel Lymph Nodementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is the only setup that ensures that all slides are timely scanned, as opposed to postdiagnostic scanning. Furthermore, this would allow upfront digital diagnostics, for which such images are likely more than good enough [14], as well as preprocessed by image analysis algorithms, for example, finding metastases in sentinel nodes [15], mitoses [16] or microorganisms, or image analysis-supported grading and quantification of IHC [17]. Before the paradigm shift from "traditional" microscopy as the main tool for diagnostics to using digital slides, the use of digital slides needs to be validated on a large scale to make sure no information will be missed due to digitizing glass slides [5].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are, however, indications that histopathologists may miss low-volume metastases. [152][153][154] Because of the low frequency of this omission relative to the occurrence of TAB, our analysis may have adopted a slightly conservative stance.…”
Section: Cost-effectivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%