2006
DOI: 10.2514/1.14879
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supersonic Cavity Flows and Their Control

Abstract: A detailed experimental study of supersonic, Mach 2, flow over a three-dimensional cavity was conducted using shadowgraph visualization, unsteady surface pressure measurements, and particle image velocimetry. Large-scale structures in the cavity shear layer and visible disturbances inside the cavity were clearly observed. A large recirculation zone and high-speed reverse flow was revealed in the cavity. In addition, supersonic microjets were used at the leading edge to suppress flow unsteadiness within the cav… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
69
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 199 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
6
69
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is known from previous studies that the convective velocity ratio has a dependency on the boundary layer thickness-to-cavity depth ratio (δ/D) for two-dimensional and axisymmetric cavities (Zhang and Edwards 1990;Zhang 1995;Zhuang et al 2006). This dependency was also noted by Bauer and Dix (1991) and has been confirmed by simulations and experiments in this study (see Sridhar 2014 and the values for k c given above).…”
Section: Influence Of Boundary Layer Thickness-to-depth Ratio On Cavisupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is known from previous studies that the convective velocity ratio has a dependency on the boundary layer thickness-to-cavity depth ratio (δ/D) for two-dimensional and axisymmetric cavities (Zhang and Edwards 1990;Zhang 1995;Zhuang et al 2006). This dependency was also noted by Bauer and Dix (1991) and has been confirmed by simulations and experiments in this study (see Sridhar 2014 and the values for k c given above).…”
Section: Influence Of Boundary Layer Thickness-to-depth Ratio On Cavisupporting
confidence: 82%
“…In cavity flows, however, this approach may be susceptible to inaccuracies as pressure waves move back and forth and may interact with each other, so the matching would not necessarily correspond to the pressure wave created by the wave traveling with the structure in the shear layer. In other previous studies, the convective velocity was determined by particle image velocimetry (PIV) (Zhuang et al 2006) and via an image cross-correlation technique of PLIF images (Murray and Elliot 2001). Image cross-correlation techniques were developed mainly to track the movement of solid bodies, for which the technique has been shown to be quite useful.…”
Section: Influence Of Boundary Layer Thickness-to-depth Ratio On Cavimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar control approach, based on steady microjet injection, was very effective in controlling the resonating flowfield associated with a supersonic cavity as well. By injecting steady microjets at the leading edge of a Mach 2 cavity, Zhuang et al [26] demonstrated a reduction of more than 8 dB OASPL inside the cavity and a 20 dB reduction in the cavity tones. The control effectiveness of steady microjets on these two problems is shown in Figure 1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This actuation technique reportedly worked well for high angles of attack and is referred to as pulsed vortex generators. Bryant et al [24], Wiltse et al [25] and Smith et al [26] used piezoelectric actuators for imparting unsteady momentum for flow separation control. These actuators, also called synthetic jets, produce zero net mass flux jets with velocities in the range of 10-80 m/sec at a frequency range up to 1 kHz.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 Gruber et al 18 looked at how changes in the aft wall of an open cavity can lead to changes in the shear layer and hence the drag and residence time within the cavity. Sakamoto et al 19 revealed the complex three-dimensional nature of two-dimensional cavity flows, and the oscillatory nature of the leading edge cavity shock.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%