2016
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw1679
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supermassive black holes in the EAGLE Universe. Revealing the observables of their growth

Abstract: The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-pro t purposes provided that:• a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.Please consult the full DRO policy… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
105
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
14
105
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Sijacki et al (2015) also predict that average Eddington ratios are roughly constant over a broad range of black hole mass (at a given redshift) but drop very rapidly for the very highest mass black holes (MBH 10 9 − 10 10 M⊙, depending on redshift). This mass dependence differs from the much more gradual decrease in average Eddington ratio with increasing black hole mass found by Rosas-Guevara et al (2016) in the EAGLE simulation and the changes in the duty cycle and λsBHAR with stellar mass that we measure. Direct comparisons of the Illustis predictions of p(λsBHAR) as a function of M * are required to explore this issue.…”
Section: Agn Accretion Rate Distributions In Cosmological Simulationscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Sijacki et al (2015) also predict that average Eddington ratios are roughly constant over a broad range of black hole mass (at a given redshift) but drop very rapidly for the very highest mass black holes (MBH 10 9 − 10 10 M⊙, depending on redshift). This mass dependence differs from the much more gradual decrease in average Eddington ratio with increasing black hole mass found by Rosas-Guevara et al (2016) in the EAGLE simulation and the changes in the duty cycle and λsBHAR with stellar mass that we measure. Direct comparisons of the Illustis predictions of p(λsBHAR) as a function of M * are required to explore this issue.…”
Section: Agn Accretion Rate Distributions In Cosmological Simulationscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…The black solid line shows the BHMD to SMD ratio of the Illustris simulation with a resolution of 1820 3 (Sijacki et al 2015). The black dashed line shows the BHMD to SMD ratio of the EAGLE simulation (Furlong et al 2015;Rosas-Guevara et al 2016).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our typical SMBH mass is 10 7 M in a M * = 10 10.3 M galaxy, and is representative of EAGLE cosmological volumes (Rosas-Guevara et al 2016). The observed Häring & Rix (2004) SMBH mass-galaxy mass relation predicts about ≈ 2× more massive SMBH in their local sample, but it should be noted that this is a bulge-dominated sample.…”
Section: Agn Luminosities and Duty Cycles In Star-forming Galaxiesmentioning
confidence: 99%