2016
DOI: 10.3847/0004-637x/826/1/67
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stellar and Black Hole Mass Densities as Empirical Tracers of Co-Evolution Show Lock-Step Growth Since Z ∼ 3

Abstract: At redshifts beyondz 1, measuring the black hole (BH) galaxy relations proves to be a difficult task. The bright light of the active galactic nuclei aggravates the deconvolution of BH and galaxy properties. However, highredshift data on these relations are vital to understand the ways in which galaxies and BHs co-evolve and the ways in which they do not. In this work we use BH and stellar mass densities (BHMDs and SMDs) to constrain the possible co-evolution of BHs with their host galaxies sincez 5. The BHMDs … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At z 0.8, the BHAR/SFR does not have strong redshift dependence at a given M . The weak redshift dependence of the M BH -M relation is consistent with the observations of Schindler et al (2016) which show that the ratio between SMBH and stellar mass densities is flat as a function of redshift since z ≈ 5. Based on observations of BL AGNs, Sun et al (2015) also found a redshift-independent M BH -M relation (but also see Merloni et al 2010).…”
Section: Evolution Of the M Bh -M Relationsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…At z 0.8, the BHAR/SFR does not have strong redshift dependence at a given M . The weak redshift dependence of the M BH -M relation is consistent with the observations of Schindler et al (2016) which show that the ratio between SMBH and stellar mass densities is flat as a function of redshift since z ≈ 5. Based on observations of BL AGNs, Sun et al (2015) also found a redshift-independent M BH -M relation (but also see Merloni et al 2010).…”
Section: Evolution Of the M Bh -M Relationsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…DeGraf et al (2015, on the other hand, found that the relation evolves slightly for z ≥ 1 for the highest mass black holes, with a steeper slope at the high-mass end at higher redshifts, making selection effects important. The more statistical study of Schindler et al (2016) found that the ratio of the black hole to stellar mass density is constant within the uncertainties from z = 0 to 5, with a slight decrease in the ratio at 3 ≤ z ≤ 5; this is also consistent with no cosmological evolution in the M BH -M * relation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 56%
“…SMBH masses correlate with host galaxy properties such as velocity dispersion, luminosity, and bulge mass (Häring & Rix 2004;Heckman & Kauffmann 2011;McConnell & Ma 2013). Additionally, as far as z = 6 there is strong similarity between both the cosmic star formation rate and total AGN luminosity and the black hole and stellar mass densities (Madau & Dickinson 2014;Schindler et al 2016). Many authors interpret these correlations as evidence for the coevolution of SMBHs and their hosts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%