1998
DOI: 10.1006/jfan.1998.3332
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Superlinear Indefinite Elliptic Problems and Pohoz′aev Type Identities

Abstract: We prove the existence of a nontrivial solution for a nonlinear elliptic problem &2u=+u+a(x) g(u) with Dirichlet boundary condition on a bounded domain, where g is superlinear both at zero and at infinity, a(x) changes sign and +>0.1998 Academic Press

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
51
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, compactness conditions are nontrivial, like the Palais-Smale condition for the energy functional Φ ∈ C 1 (H complicated. This can be seen in the paper [42] by Ramos, Terracini and Troestler, for instance. A third major difficulty appears when one wants to prove that a certain solution of (E λ ) changes sign.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…First, compactness conditions are nontrivial, like the Palais-Smale condition for the energy functional Φ ∈ C 1 (H complicated. This can be seen in the paper [42] by Ramos, Terracini and Troestler, for instance. A third major difficulty appears when one wants to prove that a certain solution of (E λ ) changes sign.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…In [42], the existence of nontrivial equilibria of (3.1) is proved for f (x, u) = λu + a(x)g(u) under some assumptions on a, g which are different from those in (A1) and (A3). In particular, those assumptions allow the difference between g(u) and |u| p−1 u to grow faster than linearly so that the superlinearity assumption (3.5) need not be true.…”
Section: Then the Sequence (W K ) Is Bounded In Ementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Denote by Ind(p−σ, u) the Morse index of u with respect to the operator −∆−(p−σ)Q(x)|u| p−1 . The uniform convergence of u n to u on compact sets implies that the Morse index Ind(p − σ, u) of u is finite (see [2] or Lemma 6 of [16]), and then Ind(p, u) is finite. Thus Proposition 2.1 yields that u L p+1 (R N ) and ∇u L p+1 (R N ) are finite.…”
Section: Lemma 32 Let U Be a Solution Of (33) Then For Any Ball mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also related to the geometric properties of solutions to PDE problems. For details see works of Bahri [2], Bahri-Lions [4], De Figueiredo-Yang [10], Lazer-Solimini [16], Pacella [18], Ramos-Terracini-Troestler [19], Solimini [24] and Yang [26], [27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%