2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2010.11.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Superior ‘theory of mind’ in borderline personality disorder: An analysis of interaction behavior in a virtual trust game

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
88
1
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
5
88
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding suggests that our participants learnt from the 'trustee population' during each round. Interestingly, Franzen et al (2011) proposed a superior 'theory of mind' in BPD because BPD patients adjusted their investment to the objective fairness of a partner in a multiround trust game, whereas healthy controls disregard the objective fairness of a partner when emotional facial expressions are present. Although we were able to control for reputation effects we can hence not fully exclude learning from feedback.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This finding suggests that our participants learnt from the 'trustee population' during each round. Interestingly, Franzen et al (2011) proposed a superior 'theory of mind' in BPD because BPD patients adjusted their investment to the objective fairness of a partner in a multiround trust game, whereas healthy controls disregard the objective fairness of a partner when emotional facial expressions are present. Although we were able to control for reputation effects we can hence not fully exclude learning from feedback.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the unfair trustee provided emotional cues, BPD patients assessed their own behaviour as more fair, while the lack of cues led patients to assess their own behaviour as unfair. The authors thus concluded that BPD patients are superior in the attribution of mental states to interaction partners when emotional cues are present (Franzen et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Amongst individuals with BPD, researchers have suggested that a deficit in cognitive empathy may contribute to the Contents lists available at ScienceDirect journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/psychresns interpersonal dysfunction typically observed (Harari et al, 2010). Franzen et al (2011) used the trust game to analyse processes of mentalising in a simulated social interaction situation. BPD patients adjusted their investment to the fairness of their partner.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous findings regarding empathy in BPD have been conflicting: some studies showed that patients exhibit less empathy compared to controls (Minzenberg et al, 2006;Preißler et al, 2010;Fertuck et al, 2009), while others found evidence for heightened empathy (Franzen et al, 2011;Dinsdale and Crespi, 2013) in patients. Although this conflicting pattern has been explained by referring to the different domains of empathy that show reduced cognitive empathy in BPD patients with unchanged or even heightened affective empathy (reviewed in Dinsdale and Crespi, 2013), here we found that even the affective domain of empathy may be reduced, possibly reflecting a compensatory response in order to protect from emotional contagion through the emotions of others that has been found in BPD (Dinsdale and Crespi, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%