Superior Performance of Aptamer in Tumor Penetration over Antibody: Implication of Aptamer-Based Theranostics in Solid Tumors

Abstract

Insufficient penetration of therapeutic agents into tumor tissues results in inadequate drug distribution and lower intracellular concentration of drugs, leading to the increase of drug resistance and resultant failure of cancer treatment. Targeted drug delivery to solid tumors followed by complete drug penetration and durable retention will significantly improve clinical outcomes of cancer therapy. Monoclonal antibodies have been commonly used in clinic for cancer treatment, but their limitation of penetrating into tumor tissues still remains because of their large size. Aptamers, as “chemical antibodies”, are 15-20 times smaller than antibodies. To explore whether aptamers are superior to antibodies in terms of tumor penetration, we carried out the first comprehensive study to compare the performance of an EpCAM aptamer with an EpCAM antibody in theranostic applications. Penetration and retention were studied in in vitro three-dimensional tumorspheres, in vivo live animal imaging and mouse colorectal cancer xenograft model. We found that the EpCAM aptamer can not only effectively penetrate into the tumorsphere cores but can also be retained by tumor sphere cells for at least 24 h, while limited tumor penetration by EpCAM antibody was observed after 4 h incubation. As observed from in vivo live animal imaging, EpCAM aptamers displayed a maximum tumor uptake at around 10 min followed by a rapid clearance after 80 min, while the signal of peak uptake and disappearance of antibody appeared at 3 h and 6 h after intravenous injection, respectively. The signal of PEGylated EpCAM aptamers in xenograft tumors was sustained for 26 h, which was 4.3-fold longer than that of the EpCAM antibody. Consistently, there were 1.67-fold and 6.6-fold higher accumulation of PEGylated aptamer in xenograft tumors than that of antibody, at 3 h and 24 h after intravenous administration, respectively. In addition, the aptamer achieved at least a 4-time better tumor penetration in xenograft tumors than that of the antibody at a 200 μm distances from the blood vessels 3 h after intravenous injection. Taken together, these data indicate that aptmers are superior to antibodies in cancer theranostics due to their better tumor penetration, more homogeneous distribution and longer retention in tumor sites. Thus, aptamers are promising agents for targeted tumor therapeutics and molecular imaging.

A combined microRNA-based targeted therapeutic approach to eradicate glioblastoma stem-like cells

“…The main advantages for aptamer use in vivo as cell targeting moieties, include the extraordinary high binding specificity, long-term stability, little to no immunogenicity and off target toxicity [23]. Further, because of their small size, aptamers easily penetrate tumor tissues and tumor-derived spheres [24].…”

Aptamer-guided DNA tetrahedron as a novel targeted drug delivery system for MUC1-expressing breast cancer cells in vitro

“…Aptamers are short, single-stranded oligonucleotides (DNA and RNA) that can form complicated three dimensional structures and bind with a target molecule with high specificity and affinity [23]. As tumor-targeting ligands, aptamers have certain advantages compared with antibodies, including a high capacity for penetrating solid tumors, low immunogenicity, high binding specificity, low production cost, and consistent quality among production batches [24, 25]. DNA Td holds some advantages as a potential drug carrier of the anticancer agent doxorubicin [26].…”

Investigation of a Thromboxane A 2 Receptor–Based Vaccine for Managing Thrombogenesis

“…This is because the distribution of antibodies to compartments other than the vascular is, in general, restricted because of poor penetration of the endothelial cell layer 61, 62, 63. Thus, these approaches may allow us to address bleeding time and thrombosis under conditions of selective modulation of the platelet TPRs, but not those TPRs of the smooth muscle64, 65, 66 (which are known to affect bleeding time).…”