2016
DOI: 10.1049/el.2016.1565
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Superior execution time design of optimal (Wiener) time‐frequency filter

Abstract: ompletely pipelined signal adaptive multicycle hardware design of the optimal time-frequency (TF) filter is developed and verified. The design retains all desirable characteristics of the corresponding recently proposed signal adaptive solution with the optimised time and hardware requirements, but additionally improves the execution timefor a clock cycle per each TF point performed within the estimation, resulting in the improvement of up to 50% in terms of points lying outside the instantaneous frequency of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, within the hardware development, the trigonometric functions are implemented by using the first two terms of the corresponding Taylor series [17], whereas the MATLAB uses 250 terms. Finally, note that the influence of the finite register lengths is the additional source of difference between the hardware-based and softwarebased results [27][28][29][30][31]. Difference between the hardware-based and software-based results can be reduced, if required, by using more precise approximations of mathematical formulas in hardware realisation.…”
Section: Testing and Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, within the hardware development, the trigonometric functions are implemented by using the first two terms of the corresponding Taylor series [17], whereas the MATLAB uses 250 terms. Finally, note that the influence of the finite register lengths is the additional source of difference between the hardware-based and softwarebased results [27][28][29][30][31]. Difference between the hardware-based and software-based results can be reduced, if required, by using more precise approximations of mathematical formulas in hardware realisation.…”
Section: Testing and Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that there are special purpose hardware systems with different configurations for the STFT realisation [32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39]. The STFT realisations are commonly used, as an initial stage, in more sophisticated systems dedicated for the realisation of the advanced time-frequency (TF) representations [40][41][42][43][44][45], as well as for realisation of the advanced time-varying and space-varying filtering systems [46][47][48][49]. However, multiple STFTs are evaluated in the QML which is one of the main difficulties in both software and hardware realisations of this algorithm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various schemes for time-varying filters have been proposed, including the explicit time-varying filter [ 13 ], the implicit time-varying filter [ 13 ], the variable bandwidth filter [ 14 ], the time-frequency projection filter [ 15 ], and the adaptive filter [ 16 , 17 ]. In an adaptive filter, the received noisy signal is subjected to filtering and the filtered output is compared with a desired signal to compute the error.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%