2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.aop.2012.12.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Superinsulator–superconductor duality in two dimensions

Abstract: For nearly a half century the dominant orthodoxy has been that the only effect of the Cooper pairing is the state with zero resistivity at finite temperatures, superconductivity. In this work we demonstrate that by the symmetry of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle relating the amplitude and phase of the superconducting order parameter, Cooper pairing can generate the dual state with zero conductivity in the finite temperature range, superinsulation. We show that this duality realizes in the planar Josephson… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
103
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(112 citation statements)
references
References 169 publications
(274 reference statements)
3
103
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in contrast to the theoretical framework of refs 11,12,17 in which the high-B insulating state, termed a superinsulator 11,12 , is taken to be a dual state of the superconducting phase. We note that in these models, and in Josephson junction arrays (ref.…”
Section: T0/2tcontrasting
confidence: 40%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This is in contrast to the theoretical framework of refs 11,12,17 in which the high-B insulating state, termed a superinsulator 11,12 , is taken to be a dual state of the superconducting phase. We note that in these models, and in Josephson junction arrays (ref.…”
Section: T0/2tcontrasting
confidence: 40%
“…This stronger insulating behaviour for B/B c > 2 violates duality symmetry already in the activated transport regime (compare R versus T in Fig. 3) and therefore cannot be explained by a low-T transition to a superinsulating state 11,12 . Near a quantum phase transition, criticality results in scaling laws 1,4 .…”
Section: T0/2tmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…thin amorphous or granular metallic films on insulators, [23][24][25][26] fractal Pb films on silicon, 27 Pb-Si hetorojunctions, 28 amorphous metal-metalloid films, [29][30][31][32][33] cuprate superconductors [34][35][36][37][38] and heavily doped semiconductors. [39][40][41][42][43] There has been an academic debate about the nature of this phase transition and the origin of the large negative MR. 12,[44][45][46] Some theories consider a global quantum phase transition 21,33,47,48 or quantum corrections to the classical magnetotransport. 12,24,49,50 Here we report on large negative and positive MR in Ga-rich, p-type Si films and demonstrate that a simple phenomenological model based on local superconductivity and hopping transport can describe the complex temperature and field dependence of the resistance.…”
Section: R(b)−r(0) R(0) R (B) > R (0) Positive Mr R(b)−r(0) R(b)mentioning
confidence: 99%