Superhydrophobic Surfaces: Are They Really Ice-Repellent?

Abstract

This work investigates the anti-ice performance of various superhydrophobic surfaces under different conditions. The adhesion strength of glaze ice (similar to that deposited during "freezing rain") is used as a measure of ice-releasing properties. The results show that the ice-repellent properties of the materials deteriorate during icing/deicing cycles, as surface asperities appear to be gradually damaged. It is also shown that the anti-icing efficiency of superhydrophobic surfaces is significantly lower in a humid atmosphere, as water condensation both on top of and between surface asperities takes place, leading to significantly larger values of ice adhesion strength. This work thus shows that superhydrophobic surfaces are not always ice-repellent and their use as anti-ice materials may therefore be limited.

The icephobic performance of alkyl-grafted aluminum surfaces

“…Relatively poor or reduced performance was reported for several types of SHSs tested under repeated icing/deicing conditions [15,16,22,29,31], which was attributed to their poor abrasive resistance (also reported by others in a concise review [32]). In parallel, SHSs were reported to lose their anti-icing performance in a humid atmosphere, when icing follows (or occurs simultaneously with) water condensation or frost formation in their rough structures [2,13,16,22,33].…”

“…Therefore, the prevention and control of ice accretion is of high potential in all these fields of human activity. The design and use of surfaces/coatings with minimum ice adherence and reduced ice accumulation is still actively considered as the most appealing and universal approach to the problem [3,[5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. Most of the existing studies on anti-ice surfaces are focused on the reduction of ice adhesion strength [1,[5][6][7][8]10,[19][20][21][22][23][24] or delayed ice nucleation/formation [3,9,12,13,23,25,26].…”

“…Most of the existing studies on anti-ice surfaces are focused on the reduction of ice adhesion strength [1,[5][6][7][8]10,[19][20][21][22][23][24] or delayed ice nucleation/formation [3,9,12,13,23,25,26]. Therefore lately the research in this area has been chiefly focused on the use and development of superhydrophobic surfaces (SHSs) for preventing ice formation and accumulation [4,[9][10][11][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][25][26][27][28][29]. Significantly delayed ice formation [3,10,12,13,15,16,23,26] and reduced ice adhesion or accumulation [3,…”

“…Therefore lately the research in this area has been chiefly focused on the use and development of superhydrophobic surfaces (SHSs) for preventing ice formation and accumulation [4,[9][10][11][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][25][26][27][28][29]. Significantly delayed ice formation [3,10,12,13,15,16,23,26] and reduced ice adhesion or accumulation [3,10,[15][16][17]19,21,25] have been reported for various SHSs. Theoretical models have also been developed, demonstrating how SHSs can delay ice formation from impinging water droplets [9,11,13], which is in good agreement with experimental work [3,14,25,26].…”

“…At the same time, several recent reports have raised doubts about SHSs as universal and durable anti-ice materials with long-term service and high efficiency under different conditions [1,[13][14][15][16]22,27,[29][30][31].…”