1992
DOI: 10.1086/171469
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Superhump timing in SU Ursae Majoris systems - Implications of the data for the processing disk model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using the "mean" P SH = 0.08108 d from the entire 2002 superoutburst, we obtain = 4.1%. These fractional superhump excesses are not unusual for an SU UMatype dwarf nova with this P orb (Molnar & Kobulnicky 1992; Patterson 1998), suggesting that V359 Cen should have a normal binary mass ratio q = M 2 /M 1 in spite of its rather unusual outburst characteristics.…”
Section: Superhump Excess and Late Superhumpsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Using the "mean" P SH = 0.08108 d from the entire 2002 superoutburst, we obtain = 4.1%. These fractional superhump excesses are not unusual for an SU UMatype dwarf nova with this P orb (Molnar & Kobulnicky 1992; Patterson 1998), suggesting that V359 Cen should have a normal binary mass ratio q = M 2 /M 1 in spite of its rather unusual outburst characteristics.…”
Section: Superhump Excess and Late Superhumpsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…LL And underwent its last known outburst in 1993 December, reaching V \ 13.8 and showing Balmer absorption lines with possible emission cores (Howell & Hurst 1994). Observation of the superhump period (Kato 1993) of 82 minutes combined with the known relationship between superhump and orbital periods (Molnar & Kobulnicky 1992) allowed Howell & Hurst to derive an orbital period of 79 minutes. The faintness of the system resulted in poor S/N spectra from APO, but a good spectrum was obtained with the MMT in 1996 October when LL And was 3 yr into quiescence at V \ 19.9.…”
Section: Wx Cet 2 Months Past Sobmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the well-known empirical correlation between = (P sh − P orb )/P orb and P orb (Molnar & Kobulnicky 1992;Patterson 2001), where P orb and P sh are the orbital and superhump periods respectively, we tried to estimate the value of orbital period. In the vicinity of the period gap, ∼ 0.05.…”
Section: Ccd Light Curve and Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%