2019
DOI: 10.1002/adma.201900651
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Superelastic Hard Carbon Nanofiber Aerogels

Abstract: Superelastic carbon aerogels have been widely explored by graphitic carbons and soft carbons. These soft aerogels usually have delicate microstructures with good fatigue resistance but ultralow strength. Hard carbon aerogels show great advantages in mechanical strength and structural stability due to the sp3‐C‐induced turbostratic “house‐of‐cards” structure. However, it is still a challenge to fabricate superelastic hard carbon‐based aerogels. Through rational nanofibrous structural design, the traditional rig… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
93
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 160 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
3
93
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After 95% cyclic compression for ten cycles, the maximum pressure and Young's modulus of 3D BHGM remained at 90.1% and 73.3% of the initial value, and irreversible deformation is only 0.9% (Figure S11, Supporting Information). Figure i shows the Young's modulus of 3D‐printed BHGMs is more than three times higher than the traditional superelastic bulk graphene materials . In addition, the resilience and stability of our ultralight BHGMs are also remarkably better than the previously reported 3D‐printed graphene materials (Table S1, Supporting Information) …”
mentioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After 95% cyclic compression for ten cycles, the maximum pressure and Young's modulus of 3D BHGM remained at 90.1% and 73.3% of the initial value, and irreversible deformation is only 0.9% (Figure S11, Supporting Information). Figure i shows the Young's modulus of 3D‐printed BHGMs is more than three times higher than the traditional superelastic bulk graphene materials . In addition, the resilience and stability of our ultralight BHGMs are also remarkably better than the previously reported 3D‐printed graphene materials (Table S1, Supporting Information) …”
mentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The density of 3D HGM and 3D BHGM is 8.7 and 8.5 mg cm −3 , respectively. i) Young's modulus of 3D‐printed BHGMs show threefold higher than the conventional bulk superelastic materials with comparable geometric density …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ultrastability of the GA array sensor enables the reliability of massive data ( fig. S26), setting the basis for reliable AI tactile finger (30)(31)(32) and carbon aerogels (12,33,34), in the merits of GF and strain range. (E) Mechanical control of the robotic hand with the GA sensor to identify the density of ultralight carbon aerogel (ULCA).…”
Section: Ai Microarray Sensor Of Gasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e) The loss of elasticity of the isobutylene isoprene rubber after frozen in LN 2 for comparison. als, [30,[37][38][39] for example,g raphene,c arbon nanotubes,h ave recently been reported to show elasticity in LN 2 .H owever, purely organic materials (including polymers) that display elasticity at such extreme circumstances are not known. It is amazing for the high-density materials formed with organic small molecules,e specially those in the highly crystalline state,toshow elasticity at ultra-low temperatures.Properties of the crystal at high temperatures have also been tested.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%