2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.anucene.2016.06.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supercritical water heat transfer for nuclear reactor applications: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of the experimental and numerical investigations have been conducted to explore supercritical water and carbon dioxide (sCO 2 ) [12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. Dang and Hihara [19,20] investigated the effects of tube diameter on heat transfer coefficient of sCO 2 under cooling conditions and proposed the modified Gnielinski equation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the experimental and numerical investigations have been conducted to explore supercritical water and carbon dioxide (sCO 2 ) [12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. Dang and Hihara [19,20] investigated the effects of tube diameter on heat transfer coefficient of sCO 2 under cooling conditions and proposed the modified Gnielinski equation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of investigations have been devoted to the supercritical heat transfer for various fluids [14][15][16][17]. However, while most of these studies were aimed at supercritical water and CO 2 [18][19][20][21], few studies have been devoted to the heat transfer of supercritical kerosene. Edwards [6] and Powell et al [22] carried out a series of experiments on the heat transfer and thermal stability of aviation kerosene for hypersonic propulsion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the several related research works on the supercritical fluids (SCFs) conducted in the recent past [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] in addition to the decades together related research experience [15][16][17][18][19][20] and based on those findings, it is reasonable to believe that the development of a SCWR is one of the viable options to implement the generation IV nuclear reactor in practice and make it operational in the near future, provided the remaining uncertainties associated with a new possible technology are addressed adequately. The TH stability and the related safety of the SCWR are one of the important identified areas which have received a considerable importance among the concerned scientific community.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%