Superando o falicismo: sofrimento materno na psicanálise de crianças

Abstract

Interpreta-se, no contexto da psicanálise de uma criança psicótica, o sofrimento materno e suas implicações nos destinos do tratamento. O sofrimento parental interfere negativamente quando compele à repetição fantasmática de traumatismos cujas mensagens, uma vez intrometidas, não são elaboradas pelos pais. Como demonstra o caso clínico, o falicismo materno e a foraclusão da função paterna não necessariamente estão presentes na geração da psicose. Longe de ser falo, originalmente ao paciente foi atribuído o lugar de substituto de um objeto odiado numa cena traumática vivida na infância materna, responsável pela intromissão de mensagens sexuais em torno de experiências de nascimento e morte, revividas fantasmaticamente no contexto da análise de seu filho.

Psicoterapia psicanalítica infantil: o lugar dos pais

“…Ocorre também que, por diversas vezes, a busca ativa dos pais pelo analista durante o decorrer do tratamento, para falar sobre o fi lho, figura como a enunciação mascarada de uma problemática que é própria da mãe/casal/pais (Melo et al, 2012;Priszkulnik, 1995). Para Priszkulnik (1995) a escuta analítica permite ajudar os pais ".…”

Psychoanalytical Child Psychotherapy: The Parent’s Role

“…It also happens that, on various occasions, the active search of the parents for the analyst during the course of the treatment, to talk to him about the child, fi gures as a masked enunciation of a problem that belongs to the mother/couple/ parents (Melo et al, 2012;Priszkulnik, 1995). For Priszkulnik (1995), analytical listening allows the parents to be helped ".…”

“…As a result, for the author, a pre-transference of a, predominantly positive, neurotic character would be essential to obtain good results with brief psychotherapy, for example. Furthermore, the presence of the parents as a certain invasion of the treatment of the child is carried out in various ways, often in the form of a boycott of the analysis, or in the attack on the place of the analyst, as well as through demands of positioning regarding the external issues, such as education and justice, the formation of confusion and secrets with the child or, as very often happens, withdrawal from the treatment (Lisondo 2001;Melo et al, 2012). It is therefore necessary, to consider, in a general way, the infl uence of the transference of the parents onto the analyst, which will take place in a special way, even if they are not included in the treatment (Lisondo, 2001).…”

“…Although a particular parental type cannot be coupled to a single and decisive relationship with the diagnosis of the child, Lerner (2002) and also Melo et al (2012) suggest that an attentive look at the transference manifestations of the parents in these cases allows a particular comprehension of their relationship with the etiology of the symptom and with the development of the therapeutic process. Also according to these authors, when the parents look at the child in a way that denotes certainties that are diffi cult to challenge, and in particular when there is nothing to suppose there (Lerner, 2002), there is not, consequently, a possible mother for an impossible child, this child that can only be in the condition of who never learns, will not have anything to say, will not evolve.…”

“…These parents are in the place of impotence, as is the analyst, whose interventions can often be rejected, repulsed -demeaned. The maternal suffering thus denotes the phallic place of the child at the expense of a high price in terms of the anxiety and of the permanence of untranslated parental puzzles (Melo et al, 2012). It is a complex picture in which the health of the child will depend on the possibility of the posture of the mother changing, referring to a third instance that makes a cut in this relationship of unequivocal holder of certainties about the child.…”