2005
DOI: 10.1002/pmic.200300885
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

18O‐labeling quantitative proteomics using an ion trap mass spectrometer

Abstract: We describe a method for simultaneous identification and quantitation of proteins within complex mixtures. The method consists of 18O-labeling, a simple stable isotope-coding that requires merely enzymatic digestion in 18O-water, in combination with a capillary-liquid chromatography electrospray ion-trap mass spectrometer. In a separate experiment using the same sample and a spike test, we demonstrate that the difference ration was calculated accurately using the 18O-labeling method even if the protein was par… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
84
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
84
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This mode of operation has been used for numerous quantitative proteomics studies [25][26][27][28]. Although the linear ion trap is unlikely to replace the triple quadrupole instrument (using SRM/MRM) for MS-based quantitation in the clinical setting, there are advantages of using the ion trap for early stage testing of candidate biomarkers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This mode of operation has been used for numerous quantitative proteomics studies [25][26][27][28]. Although the linear ion trap is unlikely to replace the triple quadrupole instrument (using SRM/MRM) for MS-based quantitation in the clinical setting, there are advantages of using the ion trap for early stage testing of candidate biomarkers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Triple quadrupole instruments, already entrenched in clinical laboratories for measuring small molecules, have consistently provided measurements with high precision (CVs below 5%), a good linear response range (>10 3 ), and high sensitivity of detection (less than 1 ng/mL). Linear ion trap instruments, far more common in proteomics laboratories involved with biomarker discovery, have only recently been tested in this setting [24] but are nonetheless widely used for quantification [25][26][27][28]. To determine the performance characteristics of our magnetic beadbased capture system coupled to a linear ion trap, we assessed the linear range, limit of quantification, accuracy, and precision for our two test antigens, alpha-1-antichymotrypsin (AAC) and TNFα.…”
Section: Performance Characteristics Of Siscapa-ms Coupled Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…etry (32,(53)(54)(55)(56)(57). We exploit the characteristic fragmentation of isotopically labeled peptides to enhance their identification, a well established principle that goes back to the period preceding the modern era of ESI and LC-MS/MS (36,37) and has since been applied effectively by a number of investigators (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the method should also be applicable to other C/N-terminal labeling techniques provided that the labeling does not cause chromatographic separation and the mass shift is small enough to allow the use of a precursor window of reasonable width. Many previously reported labeling methods such as 18 O labeling through tryptic digestion (36,37) can be used without modifying the established protocols.…”
Section: Demonstration Of Multiplex Ms/ms Quantification Using Signalmentioning
confidence: 99%