2022
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac69d5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sun-as-a-star Spectroscopic Observations of the Line-of-sight Velocity of a Solar Eruption on 2021 October 28

Abstract: The propagation direction and true velocity of a solar coronal mass ejection, which are among the most decisive factors for its geo-effectiveness, are difficult to determine through single-perspective imaging observations. Here we show that Sun-as-a-star spectroscopic observations, together with imaging observations, could allow us to solve this problem. Using observations of the Extreme Ultraviolet Variability Experiment onboard the Solar Dynamics Observatory, we found clear blueshifted secondary emission com… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(47 reference statements)
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This excludes the possibility of chromospheric evaporation because in such a case, the 10 MK upflows are expected to be accompanied by an increasing density of the corresponding flaring plasma. Instead, we suggest that this is most likely caused by a plasma ejection event coupled to the flare, i.e., filament/prominence eruption, as reported by Muheki et al (2020b) on EV Lac and by Xu et al (2022) from Sun-as-a-star observations. In this scenario, the expanding magnetized structure may erupt with cool and warm materials, thus naturally resulting in the simultaneous blueshifts of cool/warm lines and a decreasing plasma density.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This excludes the possibility of chromospheric evaporation because in such a case, the 10 MK upflows are expected to be accompanied by an increasing density of the corresponding flaring plasma. Instead, we suggest that this is most likely caused by a plasma ejection event coupled to the flare, i.e., filament/prominence eruption, as reported by Muheki et al (2020b) on EV Lac and by Xu et al (2022) from Sun-as-a-star observations. In this scenario, the expanding magnetized structure may erupt with cool and warm materials, thus naturally resulting in the simultaneous blueshifts of cool/warm lines and a decreasing plasma density.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Solar CMEs are known as the main driver of severe space weather disturbances (Gosling 1993) and have been routinely imaged by white-light coronagraphs (Webb & Howard 2012). The possibility of CME detection through Sunas-a-star observations has also been demonstrated (Mason et al 2016;Yang et al 2022;Xu et al 2022). As their counterparts, stellar CMEs have also gained more and more attention in recent years because of the potential hazard they pose to exoplanetary space weather (Airapetian et al 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From spatially resolved extremeultraviolet (EUV) spectroscopic observations, Tian et al (2012) reported obvious blue-wing enhancements in several spectral lines during a solar CME eruption. A CME-caused blue-wing enhancement has also been detected in the Sun-as-a-star EUV spectra (Xu et al 2022). Inspired by these results, Yang et al (2022) recently developed an analytical CME model and demonstrated that stellar CMEs can also be detected through EUV spectroscopy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Besides the aforementioned paper by Papaioannou et al (2022), there are several other publications devoted to the analysis of the SEP-GLE73 event and associated solar activity phenomena: Battaglia, Collier, & Krucker (2022); Hou et al (2022); Li et al (2022); Klein et al (2022); Li et al (2022); Mishev et al (2022); Xu et al (2022). The solar manifestations of this event were observed with a number of spacecraft, in particular, with the Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite (GOES; https://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/stp/satellite/goes/), the Solar and Heliospheric Observatory (SOHO; Domingo et al 1995), the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO; Pesnell, Thompson, & Chamberlin 2012), the Solar TErrestrial RElations Observatory (STEREO-A; Kaiser et al 2008), the Parker Solar Probe (PSP; Fox et al 2016), and the Solar Orbiter (SolO; Müller et al 2020).…”
Section: Overview Of the Eventmentioning
confidence: 99%