2016
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157767
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sumoylation Inhibits the Growth Suppressive Properties of Ikaros

Abstract: The Ikaros transcription factor is a tumor suppressor that is also important for lymphocyte development. How post-translational modifications influence Ikaros function remains partially understood. We show that Ikaros undergoes sumoylation in developing T cells that correspond to mono-, bi- or poly-sumoylation by SUMO1 and/or SUMO2/3 on three lysine residues (K58, K240 and K425). Sumoylation occurs in the nucleus and requires DNA binding by Ikaros. Sumoylated Ikaros is less effective than unsumoylated forms at… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with this increased binding to DNA, IKZF1 R183H/C expression resulted in hyperrepression of the HES1 and MCL1 promoter activities and the hyperactivation of the MSH2 promoter activity (when compared with IKZF1 WT ), which are known targets of IKZF1 (Fig. 2E) (16,17). In contrast, expression of IKZF1 N159S and IKZF1 R162Q had no effect as expected for loss-of-function variants.…”
Section: Of 14supporting
confidence: 67%
“…Consistent with this increased binding to DNA, IKZF1 R183H/C expression resulted in hyperrepression of the HES1 and MCL1 promoter activities and the hyperactivation of the MSH2 promoter activity (when compared with IKZF1 WT ), which are known targets of IKZF1 (Fig. 2E) (16,17). In contrast, expression of IKZF1 N159S and IKZF1 R162Q had no effect as expected for loss-of-function variants.…”
Section: Of 14supporting
confidence: 67%
“…Key to this model is that sumoylation takes place only after Sko1 has bound DNA, which is supported by our finding that DNA binding mutations eliminate Sko1 sumoylation. Similarly, DNA binding mutations have been shown to prevent sumoylation of other TFs such as Gcn4 and Ikaros, as well as non-TF DNA-binding proteins, including yeast Yku70, human TDG and viral ULFF, which are involved in DNA damage repair [28,65,66]. This suggests that the sumoylation apparatus can distinguish between DNA-bound and unbound forms of many chromatin-associated proteins, possibly as a result of conformational changes that may occur after binding DNA, or due to the proximity of the sumoylation machinery with chromatin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 39-41 Sumoylation of the hematopoiesis-associated TF Ikaros was shown to depend on its intact DNA-binding domain, suggesting that SUMO regulates Ikaros function specifically after it binds to its chromatin targets. 42 A number of groups have used ChIP in yeast or mammalian cells to show that Ubc9 and sumoylated proteins are detected specifically near promoters or transcriptional start sites of actively transcribed RNAP II-dependent genes, which implies that sumoylation plays a general role in regulating TFs during active transcription. 43-47 For the most part, the specific function of SUMO at these transcriptionally active chromatin sites is unknown, and whether sumoylation affects occupancy of TFs while bound to DNA during active transcription has not been examined.…”
Section: Association With and Availability To Bind Chromatinmentioning
confidence: 99%