2021
DOI: 10.7554/elife.57720
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SUMO is a pervasive regulator of meiosis

Abstract: Protein modification by SUMO helps orchestrate the elaborate events of meiosis to faithfully produce haploid gametes. To date, only a handful of meiotic SUMO targets have been identified. Here we delineate a multidimensional SUMO-modified meiotic proteome in budding yeast, identifying 2747 conjugation sites in 775 targets, and defining their relative levels and dynamics. Modified sites cluster in disordered regions and only a minority match consensus motifs. Target identities and modification dynamics imply th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
58
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 242 publications
1
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5c ). We therefore conclude that Nur1 and Lrs4 are SUMOylated in vivo, which is in line with two proteomics studies 39 , 40 .
Fig.
…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…5c ). We therefore conclude that Nur1 and Lrs4 are SUMOylated in vivo, which is in line with two proteomics studies 39 , 40 .
Fig.
…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Indeed, the C-terminus of Hop1, where the closure motif is located, contains a region rich in arginine and lysine residues that resembles an NLS. Moreover, SUMO-conjugated sites with a potential regulatory role have been recently identified in this Hop1 C-terminal region [70]. It is likely that the conformational change involves the transition from the closed to the unbuckled conformation of Hop1 PLOS GENETICS described in vitro [44], but the occurrence of this event remains to be demonstrated in vivo.…”
Section: Nucleocytoplasmic Communication Underlies Meiotic Checkpoint Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition phospho-specific nanobodies and FRET-based kinase sensors (Oldach and Zhang, 2014;Traenkle and Rothbauer, 2017) may provide an opportunity to follow in vivo phospho-dynamics, which remains a key frontier in understanding the regulation of meiotic prophase. Finally, it will also be important to understand the crosstalk between protein phosphorylation with other signaling modes and protein modifications, including ubiquitylation and sumoylation, which are abundantly present in meiotic prophase (Cheng et al, 2006;Watts and Hoffmann, 2011;Nottke et al, 2017;Rao et al, 2017;Bhagwat et al, 2021), and to integrate nuclear events with regulation outside of the nucleus. For example, B-type cyclins in S. cerevisiae are translationally regulated by phosphorylation of an RNA-binding protein (Berchowitz et al, 2015;Carpenter et al, 2018) and mitochondrial localization is controlled by Ime2 kinase (Sawyer et al, 2019).…”
Section: Challenges Aheadmentioning
confidence: 99%