2021
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1009560
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pch2 orchestrates the meiotic recombination checkpoint from the cytoplasm

Abstract: During meiosis, defects in critical events trigger checkpoint activation and restrict cell cycle progression. The budding yeast Pch2 AAA+ ATPase orchestrates the checkpoint response launched by synapsis deficiency; deletion of PCH2 or mutation of the ATPase catalytic sites suppress the meiotic block of the zip1Δ mutant lacking the central region of the synaptonemal complex. Pch2 action enables adequate levels of phosphorylation of the Hop1 axial component at threonine 318, which in turn promotes activation of … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
32
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
(157 reference statements)
2
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The CM of Red1 (located 340–362; West et al, 2018 ) binds to Hop1 with a higher affinity than the CM of Hop1 ( West et al, 2018 ). There is mounting evidence in budding yeast and Arabidopsis , that, in addition to a chromosomal pool, a significant pool of Hop1 is non-chromosomal (in the nucleoplasm or cytoplasm) ( Herruzo et al, 2021 ; Raina and Vader, 2020 ; Yang et al, 2020 ). Once bound to its own CM, Hop1 should not be able to interact with its chromosomal axis binding partner Red1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CM of Red1 (located 340–362; West et al, 2018 ) binds to Hop1 with a higher affinity than the CM of Hop1 ( West et al, 2018 ). There is mounting evidence in budding yeast and Arabidopsis , that, in addition to a chromosomal pool, a significant pool of Hop1 is non-chromosomal (in the nucleoplasm or cytoplasm) ( Herruzo et al, 2021 ; Raina and Vader, 2020 ; Yang et al, 2020 ). Once bound to its own CM, Hop1 should not be able to interact with its chromosomal axis binding partner Red1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meiotic HORMADs collaborate with cohesins and other axial proteins to organize meiotic chromosomes into linear axial elements functionally capable of undergoing interhomolog pairing, synapsis and recombination (Ur & Corbett, 2021). While PCH-2 has been implicated in remodeling meiotic HORMADs away from meiotic chromosomes to ensure their availability (Herruzo et al, 2021; Herruzo et al, 2016) and entry into the nucleus (Yang, Hu, Portheine, Chuenban, & Schnittger, 2020), its localization to meiotic chromosomes before and after synapsis (Cuacos et al, 2021; Deshong et al, 2014; Joshi et al, 2009; Lambing et al, 2015; San-Segundo & Roeder, 1999) suggests a role remodeling meiotic HORMADs on chromosomes as well. To test this, we used structured illumination microscopy to more closely investigate whether PCH-2’s localization was consistent with remodeling meiotic HORMADs on axial elements.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PCH2 in C. elegans promotes CO assurance independent of HORMAD removal ( 43 ). Pch2 in budding yeast is required for the meiotic recombination checkpoint independent of its accumulation on the SC and Hop1 release ( 31 , 33 , 46 , 47 , 67 ). Pch2 in budding yeast also regulates proper CO levels and distribution ( 63 ), but the connection to Hop1 dynamics remains to be explored.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, it has been shown in Arabidopsis that PCH2 orchestrates both the chromosomal recruitment and dissociation of ASY1/Hop1 by mediating its conformational change ( 29 , 30 ). This mechanism is likely also present in mice and budding yeast ( 28 , 31–34 ). In Arabidopsis , PCH2 requires the cofactor COMET.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%