2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/robio.2017.8324571
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Summary on calibration method of line-structured light sensor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other laser-plane calibration methods (Zhang and Zhang, 2017) include the single cylindrical target (Li et al, 2022), cross-ratio unchanged calibration method (Hu et al, 2010), three-point perspective principle (Han et al, 2009), vanishing point calculation, circular targets (Gong et al, 2017) and cylindrical object (Zhu et al, 2020). Chen et al, 2012b) proposed an optical plane calibration method based on the active vision technique to realize the automatic calibration of line-structured light sensors, and their method accomplished the calibration in two steps by controlling the sensor to perform some translational motions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other laser-plane calibration methods (Zhang and Zhang, 2017) include the single cylindrical target (Li et al, 2022), cross-ratio unchanged calibration method (Hu et al, 2010), three-point perspective principle (Han et al, 2009), vanishing point calculation, circular targets (Gong et al, 2017) and cylindrical object (Zhu et al, 2020). Chen et al, 2012b) proposed an optical plane calibration method based on the active vision technique to realize the automatic calibration of line-structured light sensors, and their method accomplished the calibration in two steps by controlling the sensor to perform some translational motions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sensor accuracy is one of the most concerned issues for the calibration and the application [25]. Current calibration error generally ranges from hundreds to tens of microns, and seems to have reached their limits [26]. With the increasing demands for geometrical measurement of precision parts, higher accuracy is required.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%