1950
DOI: 10.1007/bf02852644
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sulfur and certain soil amendments for potato scab control in the peat soils of northern Iowa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1951
1951
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There was no S effect when these materials were applied PE. Since these trials were conducted on alkaline soils (pH 7.8–8.1) and these low rates were effective except at PE, the data suggest that the S effect is not due to a lowering of the pH (Hooker and Kent, 1950). However, the mode of action of S in reducing common scab and black scurf may not be altogether clear.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There was no S effect when these materials were applied PE. Since these trials were conducted on alkaline soils (pH 7.8–8.1) and these low rates were effective except at PE, the data suggest that the S effect is not due to a lowering of the pH (Hooker and Kent, 1950). However, the mode of action of S in reducing common scab and black scurf may not be altogether clear.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reduction of common scab, at least with IF application, is due to the S in the sulfate ion and the thiosulfate ion as the ammonium ion is not effective (Hooker and Kent, 1950). Additional evidence suggesting that the sulfate ion is effective in promoting potato yield and reducing tuber disease incidence is suggested from reports on the application of heavy metal ions such as Mn (Mortvedt et al, 1963).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation