2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.bej.2010.02.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sulfide assessment in bioreactors with gas replacement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar multiple growth phases have been reported previously with P11 and C. acetobutylicum fermentations (Ramachandriya et al, 2010; Tracy et al, 2008). Maximum cell mass concentrations for P11 and P7 were almost twice that observed in previous studies using bottle reactors (Ahmed et al, 2006; Hu et al, 2010; Ramachandriya et al, 2010). This could be due to the fact that the headspace gas to culture volume ratio was 2.5 times greater in the current study compared to previous studies (Ramachandriya et al, 2010).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 43%
“…Similar multiple growth phases have been reported previously with P11 and C. acetobutylicum fermentations (Ramachandriya et al, 2010; Tracy et al, 2008). Maximum cell mass concentrations for P11 and P7 were almost twice that observed in previous studies using bottle reactors (Ahmed et al, 2006; Hu et al, 2010; Ramachandriya et al, 2010). This could be due to the fact that the headspace gas to culture volume ratio was 2.5 times greater in the current study compared to previous studies (Ramachandriya et al, 2010).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 43%
“…Frankman found that the reducing agent cysteine sulfide had a bigger influence on redox potential than the composition of the syngas used in the fermentation vessel during growth of Clostridium carboxidivorans for ethanol production [49]. In fact, Hu et al found that higher cysteine sulfide concentrations in the media during growth of Clostridium strain P11 on synthetic-mixed (SM) syngas led to enhanced ethanol production, while lower concentrations triggered acetogenesis [48]. Another approach used to raise the overall ethanol yield obtained from syngas fermentation is conversion of the acetate fraction from the product broth to H 2 and CO 2 with microbial oxidation.…”
Section: Synthesis Gas Fermentationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Efforts to increase the ethanol yield over acetate in Clostridia include supplementing the media, nutrient limiting conditions (e.g., nitrogen limitation), addition of a reducing agent, pH shifts and addition of H 2 [15, 43,[45][46][47][48]. The availability of reducing agents is important because they lower the reduction-oxidation (redox) levels of the microbial environment and impact the solubility of nutrients.…”
Section: Synthesis Gas Fermentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sulfur containing gases (e.g. H 2 S) present in syngas are toxic to chemical catalysts but can be beneficial for microbial catalysts by reducing medium redox potential, stimulate redox sensitive enzymes such as CODH, and promote alcohol formation [206,207].…”
Section: Medium Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%