1972
DOI: 10.3382/ps.0510608
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sulfate Metabolism and Taurine Synthesis in the Chick

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are consistent with the findings of previous studies on broiler chickens (Martin, 1972;Anderson et al, 1975) and yellow tail juveniles (Matsunari et al, 2005). The nutritional and physiological requirements for taurine in animals are partly supplied by dietary sources and partly by biosynthesis from methionine and cysteine (Tsuboyama et al, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…These results are consistent with the findings of previous studies on broiler chickens (Martin, 1972;Anderson et al, 1975) and yellow tail juveniles (Matsunari et al, 2005). The nutritional and physiological requirements for taurine in animals are partly supplied by dietary sources and partly by biosynthesis from methionine and cysteine (Tsuboyama et al, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Martin et al (1966) demonstrated the ability of the chick to synthesize taurine from sulfate, and it has been suggested diat this could account for at least part of the beneficial response to dietary sulfate. However, the addition of taurine to a diet that would respond to sulfate supplementation does not enhance chick performance (Martin, 1972;Sasse and Baker, 1974b).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Martin (1972) reported that dietary sulfate was utilized by chicks to synthesize taurine and that in the presence of MET there was increased synthesis. Taurine as an essential component of bile salts may well play a role in enhancing biliary excretion of Cu, resulting in lower serum Cu levels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%