2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.127082
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sulfadiazine removal by peroxymonosulfate activation with sulfide-modified microscale zero-valent iron: Major radicals, the role of sulfur species, and particle size effect

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most recent work on liquid precipitation method for SZVI preparation is a multireaction system and usually contains a step of Fe­(II) release before it reacts with the sulfur source (Na 2 S). , In this case, there are three potential pathways for FeS x formation on the ZVI surface through the bonded FeS x /Fe interface: (a) reaction of inherent iron-containing compounds on the ZVI surface with S­(–II), (b) in situ formation of FeS x by surface-generated Fe­(II) with S­(–II), and (c) precipitation of externally formed FeS x solid on the ZVI surface. , However, the interfacial reaction of Fe 0 , Fe­(II), S­(–II), and FeS x on the ZVI surface is still not clear. In order to investigate the decisive pathway of forming the FeS x /Fe interface, three different systems for the preparation of SZVI were designed to simulate the above pathways by controlling the Fe­(II) source and location (Scheme ), thus probing the real interface-exchange process.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The most recent work on liquid precipitation method for SZVI preparation is a multireaction system and usually contains a step of Fe­(II) release before it reacts with the sulfur source (Na 2 S). , In this case, there are three potential pathways for FeS x formation on the ZVI surface through the bonded FeS x /Fe interface: (a) reaction of inherent iron-containing compounds on the ZVI surface with S­(–II), (b) in situ formation of FeS x by surface-generated Fe­(II) with S­(–II), and (c) precipitation of externally formed FeS x solid on the ZVI surface. , However, the interfacial reaction of Fe 0 , Fe­(II), S­(–II), and FeS x on the ZVI surface is still not clear. In order to investigate the decisive pathway of forming the FeS x /Fe interface, three different systems for the preparation of SZVI were designed to simulate the above pathways by controlling the Fe­(II) source and location (Scheme ), thus probing the real interface-exchange process.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The construction of the FeS x -containing ZVI structure can be achieved through several well-developed strategies, among which the mechanical ball-milling method undergoes a direct reaction of Fe 0 and S 0 (solid–solid reaction) to form the surface FeS x , while the liquid precipitation method (solid–liquid reaction) undergoes a complex physical and chemical process. However, the complexity of the solid–liquid reaction makes it unclear how the FeS x /Fe interface is formed. ,, The formation of FeS x is the prerequisite of SZVI preparation by the liquid precipitation method, and in this method, the commonly used sulfur sources are Na 2 S 2 O 4 , Na 2 S 2 O 3 , and Na 2 S. Although the process of FeS x formation from these sulfur sources is different, these sulfur sources can become S­(–II) through the reactions of decomposition, hydrolysis, and disproportionation, and finally, S­(–II) acts as the direct sulfur precursor that reacts with Fe­(II) to form FeS x . , Unlike S­(–II) that is produced in the liquid phase, the Fe­(II) precursor comes from the release of iron ions from the solid phase, as a consequence of the oxidation of ZVI. , As the chemical state of Fe­(II) has a significant impact on FeS x formation, whether the Fe­(II) precursor produced from the solid ZVI is adsorbed on the surface or released into the solution is an important factor in the formation of surface FeS x during SZVI preparation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9(a), for original Fe 3 O 4 @FeEDTA, the spectrum of Fe 2p3/2 on the surface of Fe 3 O 4 @FeEDTA could be deconvoluted into three peaks at 709.7, 710.8 eV and 713.2 eV. The two peaks at 709.7 and 713.2 eV correspond to Fe(II) and Fe(III) of oxidized species, 47 which may be formed by the superficial oxidation of Fe upon exposure to air. The peak at 710.8 eV (Fe 2p3/2) demonstrated the existence of FeN bonding, 48 which further proved that the FeEDTA was successfully loaded onto Fe 3 O 4 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two peaks at 709.7 and 713.2 eV correspond to Fe(II) and Fe(III) of oxidized species, 47 which may be formed by the superficial oxidation of Fe upon exposure to air. The peak at 710.8 eV (Fe 2p3/2) demonstrated the existence of Fe N bonding, 48 which further proved that the FeEDTA was successfully loaded onto Fe 3 O 4 .…”
Section: Reaction Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RS–FeS improved the degradation of OTC by PMS or H 2 O 2 , more than 80.00% of OTC was removed within 30.00 min. This proved that dispersing FeS onto the surface of RS is an efficient way to enhance the catalytic performance of RS [ 49 ]. In addition, OTC was also efficiently removed by FeS within 30 min, indicating that FeS exhibited facilitation in activating PMS and H 2 O 2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%