Using a model case of contamination of long-life semi-skimmed milk with the spores of six B. cereus strains, isolated from the farm environment and raw milk, proteolysis was monitored by measuring changes in protein content by infra-red spectroscopy; free tyrosine was measured by the Lowry method according to Juffs, and the reduction in casein fractions by SDS-PAGE. Lipolysis was monitored by the dilution extractive method. At a storage temperature of 4 °C for 4 months no enzyme processes were observed, whereas at a storage temperature of 24 °C a marked enzyme activity was found during maximum 3 weeks as well as sensory changes of UHT milk. After three weeks of storage, a reduction in protein content from 34.55 g·1 -1 milk to 29.46 ± 2.00 g·1 -1 milk, and a reduction in the free tyrosine from 0.65 to 2.13 ± 0.28 mg·ml -1 was found, as well as increased molar contents of free fatty acids (FFA) from 41.97 to 1617.22 ± 68.17 mmol·kg -1 milk fat. After six days of storage, α-casein, β-casein and κ-casein dropped to 69 ± 10%, 56 ± 16% and 43 ± 10%, respectively. Majority of changes in UHT milk depended on the B. cereus strain used, initial microbial counts and the method of heat inactivation of spores.
Bacillus cereus, spores, proteolysis, casein, lipolysisBacillus spp. are questionable components of raw milk microflora because of a difficult removal of their spores due to thermal resistance. They are significant contaminants of fresh milk in terms of hygiene, technology, and in the case of B. cereus of health, too. Brown (2000) described Bacillus spp. as microorganisms that cause significant economic losses.The spores of Bacillus spp. commonly occur in the barn environment and represent secondary contamination of milk during milking. The most frequently isolated Bacillus species from raw milk are B. licheniformis and B. cereus (Crielly et al. 1994), whereas other bacilli occur less frequently (Luká‰ová et al. 2001; Vyletûlová et al. 2001). Many researchers attribute the changes in Bacillus species distribution to seasonal influences (Sutherland and Murdock 1994). On the contrary, Luká‰ová et al. (2001) did not confirm the effect of seasonal factors on the incidence of Bacillus spp. in milk. Christiansson et al. (1999) pointed out an increased contamination of milk with B. cereus spores during the grazing season, associated with a higher incidence of spores in milk. On farms with good hygiene management, the spore counts in milk should lie within 0.2 -10 4 ·l -1 (Harmon and Kautter 1991). Bacillus spp. spores may occur also in UHT milk, as reported by B a h o u t (2000) who found the spores in 18.3% samples investigated at a count of 2.6 × 10 2 ·ml -1 and noted a presence of B. cereus. Vyletûlová (2001) monitored by ribotyping the incidence of B. cereus in milk, from raw milk to the final product (UHT milk). She assumed milk was contaminated either at the farm or recontaminated during processing.B. cereus is regarded as a psychrotrophic species. In 1998, B. weihenstephanensis was identified, previously designated as ...