1994
DOI: 10.1002/1097-4679(199403)50:2<294::aid-jclp2270500224>3.0.co;2-r
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Suicide assessment: Clinical interview vs. self-report

Abstract: This study examined whether patients disclosed the same information about suicidal behaviors on a self-report instrument that they conveyed to a clinician in a face-to-face interview. The results indicated a generally high level of agreement between these two forms of suicide assessment. The one exception was the question that concerns recent suicidal ideation, where patients tended to disclose more on the self-report form.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
76
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
76
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Amongst chronic pain studies, the tendency has been to use only one item from a standardised measure such as the Beck Depression Inventory [34] or combine items from a variety of general distress tools [16,52]. In addition, we were also aware that evidence suggests people are more likely to disclose honestly using self-report tools [53]. The BSS, as used in the current study, has been well validated for this purpose and it was hoped that the presence of the researcher when completing this measure may have enabled the person to feel better supported to disclose difficult thoughts, although this approach is not immune to recall errors and biases.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Amongst chronic pain studies, the tendency has been to use only one item from a standardised measure such as the Beck Depression Inventory [34] or combine items from a variety of general distress tools [16,52]. In addition, we were also aware that evidence suggests people are more likely to disclose honestly using self-report tools [53]. The BSS, as used in the current study, has been well validated for this purpose and it was hoped that the presence of the researcher when completing this measure may have enabled the person to feel better supported to disclose difficult thoughts, although this approach is not immune to recall errors and biases.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the use of self-report items may have introduced bias such as social desirability inhibiting responses. However, self-report measures may also lead to more open responding for items concerning suicide (Kaplan et al, 1994). Shared method bias may also inflate the correlations between self-report measures, though it should also be noted that the PROD screen uses a combination of selfreport and interviewer ratings, which may be more robust to bias.…”
Section: Number Of Subjects With No Suicidal Ideationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The assessment of suicide risk in adolescents is particularly difficult because teenagers may provide evaluators with discrepant information and have a reluctance to disclose personal information to adult authority figures (Brent et al, 1988;Velting et al, 1998). Some research suggests that suicidal patients are more likely to disclose current suicidal ideation on a self-report measure than in a clinical interview (Kaplan et al, 1994;Velting et al, 1998). …”
Section: Assessment Of Adolescent Suicide Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%