RAUMATIC STRESS IS A SIGNIFIcant public health problem 1 that frequently results in a distinctive pattern of persistent and disabling psychological and physiological symptoms. 2,3 Once thought to be primarily limited to soldiers in combat, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is now recognized in civilians, including those who have experienced natural disasters, physical and sexual assault, fire, motor vehicle and other serious trauma, as well as those who have witnessed inflicted injury or death. Exposure to a traumatic event is common, estimated in the range of 5% to 35% annually, with a lifetime exposure to 1 or more traumatic events occurring in more than 50% of the US population. 1 The clinical presentation of PTSD is characterized by moderate-to-severe symptoms in 3 separate domains: reexperiencing (intrusive thoughts, nightmares, flashbacks, images, or memories), emotional numbing and avoidance (flattened affect or detachment, loss of interest and motivation, and avoidance of any activity, place, person, or topic associated with the trauma); and Author Affiliations and Financial Disclosures are listed at the end of this article.

Subjective reports of sleep disturbance indicate that 70-91% of patients with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) have difficulty falling or staying asleep. Nightmares are reported by 19-71% of patients, depending on the severity of their PTSD and their exposure to physical aggression. Objective measures of sleep disturbance are inconsistent, with some studies that used these measures indicating poor sleep and others finding no differences compared with non-PTSD controls. Future research in this area may benefit from examining measures of instability in the microstructure of sleep. Additionally, recent findings suggest that sleep disordered breathing (SDB) and sleep movement disorders are more common in patients with PTSD than in the general population and that these disorders may contribute to the brief awakenings, insomnia and daytime fatigue in patients with PTSD. Overall, sleep problems have an impact on the development and symptom severity of PTSD and on the quality of life and functioning of patients. In terms of treatments, SSRIs are commonly used to treat PTSD, and evidence suggests that they have a small but significant positive effect on sleep disruption. Studies of serotonin-potentiating non-SSRIs suggest that nefazodone and trazodone lead to significant reductions in insomnia and nightmares, whereas cyproheptadine may exacerbate sleep problems in patients with PTSD. Prazosin, a centrally acting alpha1-adrenoceptor antagonist, has led to large reductions in nightmares and insomnia in small studies of patients with PTSD. Augmentation of SSRIs with olanzapine, an atypical antipsychotic, may be effective for treatment-resistant nightmares and insomnia, although adverse effects can be significant. Additional medications, including zolpidem, buspirone, gabapentin and mirtazapine, have been found to improve sleep in patients with PTSD. Large randomised, placebo-controlled trials are needed to confirm the above findings. In contrast, evidence suggests that benzodiazepines, TCAs and MAOIs are not useful for the treatment of PTSD-related sleep disorders, and their adverse effect profiles make further studies unlikely. Cognitive behavioural interventions for sleep disruption in patients with PTSD include strategies targeting insomnia and imagery rehearsal therapy (IRT) for nightmares. One large randomised controlled trial of group IRT demonstrated significant reductions in nightmares and insomnia. Similarly, uncontrolled studies combining IRT and insomnia strategies have demonstrated good outcomes. Uncontrolled studies of continuous positive airway pressure for SDB in patients with PTSD show that this treatment led to significant decreases in nightmares, insomnia and PTSD symptoms. Controlled studies are needed to confirm these promising findings.

Objective: This phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of fixed-dose levomilnacipran sustained release (SR) compared with placebo in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD); the study was conducted from September 2009-May 2011.Method: Outpatients met DSM-IV-TR criteria for MDD with an ongoing major depressive episode ≥ 8 weeks' duration. After a 1-week placebo lead-in, patients were randomly assigned to receive placebo (n = 179) or levomilnacipran SR 40 mg (n = 181), 80 mg (n = 181), or 120 mg (n = 183) once daily for 8 weeks of double-blind treatment, followed by a 2-week double-blind down-taper. The primary efficacy parameter was change from baseline on the clinician-rated Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score. The prespecified secondary efficacy parameter was change from baseline in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) total score. Additional efficacy measures included the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS 17 ) and Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness (CGI-S) and -Improvement (CGI-I). Safety and tolerability were also evaluated. Results:The least squares mean difference (LSMD) for change from baseline in MADRS total score was significantly superior to placebo for all dose groups: −3.23 (P = .0186), −3.99 (P = .0038), and −4.86 (P = .0005) for levomilnacipran SR 40, 80, and 120 mg, respectively. The LSMD was significantly different for levomilnacipran SR 80 mg and 120 mg versus placebo on the SDS (−2.51 and −2.57, respectively, P < .05 for both doses), HDRS 17 (−2.09 and −2.34, respectively, P < .05 for both doses), CGI-S (−0.43 [P < .01] and −0.35 [P < .05], respectively), and CGI-I (−0.34 and −0.32, respectively, P < .05 for both doses) assessments. The most common treatmentemergent adverse events (≥ 10% of any treatment group) were headache, nausea, constipation, dry mouth, increased heart rate, and hyperhidrosis.Conclusions: Levomilnacipran SR demonstrated significant improvement in depressive symptoms and functioning relative to placebo. In this study, levomilnacipran SR was generally well tolerated. September 28, 2012; accepted January 28, 2013 (doi:10.4088/JCP.12m08197 T he complex nature of major depressive disorder (MDD) suggests that recovery may be most appropriately judged by multiple factors. Even when patients achieve symptom improvement, impaired social and occupational functioning may persist and interfere with well-being. As such, it has been suggested that return to wellness in patients with MDD may be better defined by evaluating a combination of symptoms, functional status, and pathophysiologic changes. Submitted:1 The development of effective and safe new medications that address all aspects of MDD treatment is essential.Levomilnacipran (1S, 2R-milnacipran) is a potent and selective serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) in late-stage clinical development for treatment of MDD in adults. A sustained release (SR) formulation of levomilnacipran was developed to al...

SUMMARY BackgroundWhether antidepressants prevent depression during interferon-alpha ⁄ ribavirin treatment for hepatitis C virus infection has yet to be established.