Competition &Amp; Ownership in Land Passenger Transport 2005
DOI: 10.1016/b978-008044580-9/50129-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Suggestions for the Improvement of the Quality of Services of Collective Transportation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Absolute measurement (or rating) is defined as a set of intensity levels (or categories) that serves as a base to evaluate the performance of the alternatives in terms of each criterion and/or sub‐criterion (Duarte and De Souza, 2005). The procedure of AHP rating method is as follows:get experts' subjective ratings on the importance of criteria;make pair‐wise comparison of the ratings to get the weights of criteria;fix the number of element level, use pair‐wise comparison to derive the original score for each level and normalize them; andgenerate the final values of the alternative priorities.The main advantage of AHP rating method is decreasing the number of necessary comparisons when there are a large number of alternatives and pair‐wise comparison is impracticable (Sueyoshi et al , 2009; Simoes da Silva et al , 2010; Taghipour et al , 2010; Ainapur et al , 2011).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Absolute measurement (or rating) is defined as a set of intensity levels (or categories) that serves as a base to evaluate the performance of the alternatives in terms of each criterion and/or sub‐criterion (Duarte and De Souza, 2005). The procedure of AHP rating method is as follows:get experts' subjective ratings on the importance of criteria;make pair‐wise comparison of the ratings to get the weights of criteria;fix the number of element level, use pair‐wise comparison to derive the original score for each level and normalize them; andgenerate the final values of the alternative priorities.The main advantage of AHP rating method is decreasing the number of necessary comparisons when there are a large number of alternatives and pair‐wise comparison is impracticable (Sueyoshi et al , 2009; Simoes da Silva et al , 2010; Taghipour et al , 2010; Ainapur et al , 2011).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%